Tariff Revenue Debate Raises Questions for Farmers

Tariff revenues rarely flow directly back to farmers.

frozen funds usda money farm programs_Photo by ivandanru via Adobe Stock.jpg

Photo by ivandanru via Adobe Stock

Adobe Stock

LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD NEWS) — Questions are growing about how tariff revenue is used and whether farmers benefit, as trade policy again reshapes agricultural markets and federal spending priorities.

Dr. Bart Fischer of the Agricultural and Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University notes tariff revenue flows through longstanding statutory channels rooted in the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1935. Section 32 requires 30 percent of customs duties to be directed toward agricultural priorities, including export promotion, domestic consumption support, and the restoration of farmers’ purchasing power.

Tariff collections have climbed sharply. Customs duties rose from $34.6 billion in 2017 to $70.8 billion in 2019, and the Congressional Budget Office projects duties could jump from $77 billion in 2024 to about $418 billion by 2026 under expanded tariff use.

In practice, most Section 32 funds support nutrition programs rather than direct farm payments. USDA retains limited authority for commodity purchases and assistance, while appropriations rules cap farmer-directed support at roughly $350 million in carryover funds annually — a small share if 2026 projections hold.

The structure leaves policymakers relying on tools like Commodity Credit Corporation programs for farm relief despite rising tariff revenues.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Tariff revenues rarely flow directly back to farmers.
Tony St. James, RFD NEWS Markets Specialist
Related Stories
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last week said an announcement would be made on Tuesday. However, that self-imposed deadline has now passed.
Plan for a cooler global trade market in 2026 with tighter margins on exports, potential rate shifts, and premiums for reliable deliveries into Asian and African growth markets.
RFD-TV Farm Legal and Tax Expert Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law dives into a “potpourri” of ag tax and law-related issues in his latest Firm to Farm blog post.
Dr. Todd Davis, Chief Economist with the Indiana Farm Bureau, shares a snapshot of his state’s harvest conditions and insights from producers.
Lewis Williamson, from HTS Commodities, joined us to share insights on the farm economy from producers in the field.
Key signs of the U.S. beef herd’s recovery are improved pasture conditions, lower feed costs, and increased regulatory alignment and support for producers to implement targeted grazing practices.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Aimee Bissell discusses Iowa planting progress, weather conditions, fertilizer costs, and concerns over early crop development.
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer discusses SDRP payment limits and offers advice for those seeking higher limits.
Farmers are closely watching upcoming U.S.-China trade talks as rising fertilizer and diesel costs continue to pressure exports, margins, and rural economies.
Dr. David Anderson says lean beef demand and lighter cow culling are still giving cull cow prices room to push higher.
Stronger overseas demand for both fuel ethanol and feed co-products continues to reinforce corn use beyond the domestic market.
The inverted Choice-Select spread is not a strong warning sign in today’s tighter, higher-quality beef market, according to new analysis from Terrain.