Tariff Rollback Refunds Begin As USDA Targets Ag Trade Deficit Reductions

Tariff refunds are underway, potentially returning billions to importers, as agriculture groups push for a larger role in trade policy and investigations.

macro photo of federal reserve system symbol on hundred dollar bill. shallow focus. close-up with fine and sharp texture _AlexGo_AdobeStock_345880433.jpg

Photo by AlexGo via Adobe Stock

NASHVILLE, TENN. (RFD NEWS) — A major tariff refund process is getting underway today, potentially returning billions to importers. U.S. Customs and Border Protection is starting to process claims following a Supreme Court decision invalidating certain tariffs.

The agency estimates that about 82 percent of affected imports could be eligible in this first round, totaling more than $120 billion. Importers who recently paid those duties will be able to apply for refunds, some of which will include interest. Officials say the process could take time, with some payments possibly taking a year or longer to be completed.

Agriculture groups are also pushing for a bigger role in ongoing trade investigations. Several industry organizations are urging the U.S. Trade Representative to expand existing probes to include farm commodities or launch new ag-specific investigations.

The request comes as the administration reviews global trade practices, including manufacturing overcapacity and forced labor. Dairy, rice, and sugar producers say foreign subsidies and trade policies are putting pressure on U.S. agriculture.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is doubling down on efforts to reduce the agricultural trade deficit, which has declined by 42 percent in just one year. USDA Undersecretary Luke Lindberg says correcting the imbalance has required a pivot toward proactive diplomacy and market promotion.

“The United States has historically benefited from having a trade surplus in agricultural goods with the world, right? We produce the highest-quality, best-tasting, most nutritious products that are in high demand all around the world,” Lindberg said. “Unfortunately, when President Trump came into office last year, we were facing a historic break in that trend, which was a $50 billion agricultural trade deficit, where we were buying more products from overseas than we were selling. It’s been a key priority for both the Secretary and for me and the President to reduce that trade deficit and get it back to a trade surplus. We’re pleased one year later that we have knocked 42% off of that trade deficit. It’s now at $29 billion.”

Lindberg said the USDA is optimistic that this year the ag trade deficit will continue to rebound as trade officials make progress on new trade agreements that come into effect. He also assured farmers that their success also means farmer success.

“But what does this mean for farmers?” It means the farmers are winning again in the global marketplace,” he said.

Lindberg also noted some of the standout trade agreements, like the deal with the U.K., are poised to be a major boost for cattle country.

“One of the deals we wanted to highlight today for you all is the US-UK Economic Prosperity Agreement that the president signed,” Lindberg continued. “It was the first trade agreement that we got inked in this administration, and it provides new access to the United Kingdom, which, for farmers and cattle ranchers, has been an elusive market for decades. We really changed the game with this opportunity, and we’re now seeing real results. So, I was just with Omaha, Greater Omaha Packing, last week in Nebraska, toward their plant, and heard that they were the first packing cows to get their beef sold into the United Kingdom, with packages arriving last week as well. Great story. And again, all of their beef is born, raised, and processed right here in the United States of America.”

USDA is also eyeing momentum with Vietnam. Lindberg says the main areas they are looking to boost in Asia are cotton, tree nuts, wheat, and corn.

Related Stories
Stronger U.S.-Guatemala trade rules favor dependable, regionally integrated supply chains — rewarding execution and commitment over cost-only sourcing.
China-led demand continues to anchor soybean and sorghum exports despite weekly swings.
Global pork production is expected to rise in the first half of 2026, despite trade volatility stemming from shifting import policies and swine disease pressures.
Economists are also closely watching how policy decisions in Washington could influence markets moving forward. Analysts say deferred futures for corn, soybeans, and wheat suggest markets are operating near break-even levels, not at prices that would encourage expanded production.
Strong rail demand and higher fuel costs raise transportation risk even as barge and export flows stabilize.
Traders say that shift could eventually prompt the USDA to scale back soybean export projections, noting the outlook differs greatly for other grain commodities.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Lewis Williamson with HTS Commodities discusses how tensions in the Middle East are impacting producer’s spring planting decisions.
Farm Legal expert Roger McEowen discusses new dicamba regulations, compliance requirements for growers, and the evolving outlook for herbicide use.
Land values remain key to borrowing strength.
Mike Steenhoek with the Soy Transportation Coalition discusses supply chain disruptions, rising costs, and the potential impact on agriculture as farmers navigate ongoing global uncertainty.
Held each year in Mercedes, the Rio Grande Valley Livestock Show remains a cornerstone event for the region — blending education, competition, and community, even during challenging times for agriculture.
Nebraska Farm Bureau President Mark McHargue shares the latest on the wildfires, their impact on agriculture, and the challenges farmers are facing as they navigate both natural disasters and economic uncertainty.