Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern Refile $85B Rail Merger Application

Higher freight rates and potential service disruptions are key concerns for agriculture, which relies heavily on rail to move commodities.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD NEWS) — An $85 billion rail merger is back in front of federal regulators, as Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern refile their application to create the first coast-to-coast freight rail network in the United States.

The companies say the proposed deal could deliver major efficiencies across the supply chain, estimating savings of $3.5 billion annually for shippers. They also project the merger could remove more than two million trucks from U.S. roads and create roughly 1,200 union jobs.

However, opposition is mounting. Farm groups, shippers, and some state leaders warn the consolidation could reduce competition, leading to higher freight rates and potential service disruptions—key concerns for agriculture, which relies heavily on rail to move commodities.

The renewed filing follows an earlier setback from the Surface Transportation Board, which rejected the initial application due to insufficient detail.

Mike Steenhoek with the Soy Transportation Coalition explained the situation:

“What happened is that Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern had to submit a formal application to what’s called the U.S. Surface Transportation Board. That’s the government agency that has jurisdiction over approving or rejecting any kind of railroad merger or acquisition. And what the Surface Transportation Board determined was that the application was incomplete, and so they rejected the application. They really needed much more information than was provided within the application. They really need to understand, in order to make a proper ruling on this, they have to understand what’s going to be the impact on the public interest. What’s going to be the non-competition market power if this merger is allowed to move forward.”

The Surface Transportation Board is now reviewing the revised proposal, with public comments due by May 8.

RFD News will continue to follow developments as regulators weigh the potential impact on agriculture and the broader transportation system.

Related Stories
The farm bill is still moving, but the toughest amendment fights were pushed into today’s session. ASA President Scott Metzger joins us to discuss the risks of tariff actions on soybean exports, concerns over trade policy and production costs, and the importance of Farm Bill updates.
Clean power growth remains strong, but slower deal-making could affect future rural energy and land-use opportunities.
Higher biofuel mandates boost long-term crop demand, but a tighter D4 market may pressure biofuel feedstocks and pose new soybean oil demand risks.
New farm payment rules allow LLC members to have separate limits, but some local FSA offices are still applying outdated policies, creating confusion for producers.
John Mays with Central Life Sciences joins us to discuss the importance of pest management ahead of wheat storage and how protecting grain quality can support stronger marketing opportunities.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

The Purdue student team joins us to discuss how they developed Soy-Seal, their innovative soybean-based adhesive tape, and its potential ag impact.
According to a tweet from Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, the full House vote on the Farm Bill will be held until lawmakers return from recess.
Roger McEowen joins us to explain the USDA appeals process and how farmers should navigate adverse decisions and crop insurance disputes.
Higher input costs are making flexible marketing plans and updated break-even targets more important.
The House is moving forward with debate on the Farm Bill after a lengthy session in the House Rules Committee cleared the legislation for floor consideration.
March pork gains lifted total meat production, but first-quarter output still ran below last year.