Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern Refile $85B Rail Merger Application

Higher freight rates and potential service disruptions are key concerns for agriculture, which relies heavily on rail to move commodities.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD NEWS) — An $85 billion rail merger is back in front of federal regulators, as Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern refile their application to create the first coast-to-coast freight rail network in the United States.

The companies say the proposed deal could deliver major efficiencies across the supply chain, estimating savings of $3.5 billion annually for shippers. They also project the merger could remove more than two million trucks from U.S. roads and create roughly 1,200 union jobs.

However, opposition is mounting. Farm groups, shippers, and some state leaders warn the consolidation could reduce competition, leading to higher freight rates and potential service disruptions—key concerns for agriculture, which relies heavily on rail to move commodities.

The renewed filing follows an earlier setback from the Surface Transportation Board, which rejected the initial application due to insufficient detail.

Mike Steenhoek with the Soy Transportation Coalition explained the situation:

“What happened is that Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern had to submit a formal application to what’s called the U.S. Surface Transportation Board. That’s the government agency that has jurisdiction over approving or rejecting any kind of railroad merger or acquisition. And what the Surface Transportation Board determined was that the application was incomplete, and so they rejected the application. They really needed much more information than was provided within the application. They really need to understand, in order to make a proper ruling on this, they have to understand what’s going to be the impact on the public interest. What’s going to be the non-competition market power if this merger is allowed to move forward.”

The Surface Transportation Board is now reviewing the revised proposal, with public comments due by May 8.

RFD News will continue to follow developments as regulators weigh the potential impact on agriculture and the broader transportation system.

Related Stories
Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law reviews key highlights from the House Agriculture Committee’s latest farm bill proposal.
Lawmakers from Texas and Tennessee outline priorities for USMCA renegotiations, focusing on tariffs, China trade concerns, beef prices, and stability for U.S. agriculture.
The Action Aims to Lower Food Costs for Consumers and Strengthen the Supply Chain
Adequate transportation capacity exists, but fuel costs and soft river demand could widen basis risk.
Lower oil prices may trim input costs but pressure biofuel demand.
Tight storage could widen basis and limit marketing flexibility.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Mike Spier, president and CEO of U.S. Wheat Associates, discusses the new U.S.-Bangladesh trade agreement and its potential benefits for U.S. wheat growers.
Gretchen Kuck of the National Corn Growers Association joined us to discuss the Ag Coalition for USMCA’s report findings and expectations ahead of the upcoming USMCA review.
The agreement formalizes coordination between the two departments to address security concerns affecting U.S. agriculture.
Kevin Charleston of Specialty Risk Insurance discusses the importance of grain bin safety and joint efforts with Nationwide to provide farmers and first responders with access to critical, life-saving rescue tubes.
RealAg Radio host Sean Haney outlines the Trump Administration’s current trade priorities and what meaningful market expansion looks like for farmers.