USDA Links Rural Investment With Stronger County Growth

The report highlighted the role rural development programs play in supporting housing, infrastructure and essential services.

clifton-tn-antique-district_By-Austin-via-Adobe-Stock.png

The antique district in Clifton, Tennessee, was accredited by the Tennessee Main Street program in 2021 after their participation in the project. (Photo by Austin via Adobe Stock)

Photo by Austin via Adobe Stock

WASHINGTON, DC (RFD NEWS) — USDA reported last week that rural development investment is used most heavily in farming-dependent counties, connecting farm communities with housing, utilities, business financing, and essential services. The Economic Research Service reviewed Rural Development program obligations from 2000 through 2024.

Farm-dependent nonmetropolitan counties recorded the highest participation, with per-person investment rising from $3,741 in 2000-2011 to $4,693 in 2012-2024. The Southeast received the largest overall share of obligations, while the Rocky Mountain region led on a rural per-person basis.

Counties receiving the highest per-person investment averaged 39.9 percent real income growth over the study period, compared with 31.8 percent in the lowest-investment group. USDA cautions that the comparison shows an association, not proof that the funding alone caused higher growth.

Single-family housing accounted for 55 percent of obligations, and higher participation was associated with higher homeownership. Most support came through loans: 57 percent through guarantees and 33 percent through direct loans, while grants accounted for 10 percent.

For producers, rural housing, water, power, broadband, health care, and business capacity influence whether workers and families can remain in agricultural communities.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Rural development investment supports the housing, services, and infrastructure farm communities need to retain workers and remain viable.
Tony St. James, RFD News Markets Specialist
Related Stories
Pollination costs remain volatile, raising planning risk for specialty crop producers.
The USDA Agricultural Outlook Forum highlights modest price support from tighter supplies across cotton, grains, dairy, livestock, and sugar into 2026.
Farm Bureau Economist Faith Parum discusses the latest Farm Bill proposal and the path ahead for Congress and U.S. agriculture.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order this week to accelerate domestic production of phosphorus and glyphosate, signaling that farm input availability is now treated as a national security risk.
Federal aid helps, but producers will bear most of the losses. Balance sheets may look stable, but margins remain fragile without policy support.
RFD NEWS Markets Specialist Tony St. James reviews the USDA’s Farms and Land in Farms 2025 Summary.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Strong beef demand is offsetting weaker cash cattle.
Brazil logistics issues may support U.S. soybean demand.
AFBF Economist Danny Munch breaks down a new Farm Bureau analysis showing that producers now earn less than 6 cents of every food dollar, as farm input costs continue to squeeze margins.
Productivity gains are supporting supply despite limited herd expansion.
Brooks York with AgriSompo addresses how current market conditions and risk management are impacted by volatility in the Middle East, and considerations for farmers in the spring planting season.
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer provided guidance on navigating the R&D tax credit, emphasizing record-keeping, eligibility, and maximizing potential savings as crop margins remain the key pressure point for farmers.