USDA Secretary Rollins Intervenes in California Dam Dispute Over Farm Water Supplies

More than 1,100 residents and farmers have signed a letter urging Ag Secretary Brooke Rollins to step in, saying the proposal threatens irrigation supplies and long-term farm viability in the region.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD-TV) — Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins is stepping in on behalf of California farmers and ranchers amid a dispute over proposed hydroelectric dam removals that could significantly impact water supplies for agriculture. The issue centers on several hydro projects in Northern California, where Rollins says state and federal officials are prioritizing fish protections over farming operations.

Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) has proposed shutting down two dams along the Eel River, arguing that hydroelectric power generation at those sites is no longer economically viable. The utility says rising regulatory costs tied to fish safety and environmental compliance have made continued operation impractical. Under PG&E’s plan, the dams would be removed, allowing the river to return to its natural flow. While supporters argue the move would benefit fish populations and river ecosystems, local farmers warn it would eliminate a critical source of water for nearby agricultural operations.

More than 1,100 residents and farmers have signed a letter urging Secretary Rollins to intervene, saying the proposal threatens irrigation supplies and long-term farm viability in the region. In response, Rollins has filed an official notice to intervene in the process. The USDA says the move will ensure that farmers, ranchers, and rural communities have proper representation as decisions are made.

Rollins has emphasized that agricultural producers must have a seat at the table when major water and infrastructure decisions are considered, particularly in drought-prone regions where water access is already strained.

The intervention sets the stage for increased federal involvement as the future of the Eel River dams continues to be debated.

Related Stories
Conservation programs may work better when they recognize yield risk and cash-flow pressure during adoption.
In agricultural transactions, timing is often far more than a matter of convenience. A delayed closing or missed payment can lead to a major financial problem.
Fred Nichols with Huma joins us to discuss the 4 R’s of nutrient stewardship and how farmers are adapting best practices in today’s evolving ag economy.
Firefighters continue battling multiple wildfires across southwest Kansas as drought conditions fuel fire danger and raise concerns about additional cattle herd liquidation.
Dave Walton with the American Soybean Association joins us to discuss China’s new ag purchase commitments, E15 policy concerns, and spring planting conditions.
Rayburn Electric Cooperative’s Chris Anderson discusses rapid AI data center expansion, mounting pressure on the electric grid, and impacts on agriculture and rural communities.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

With 2023 projected to be a difficult year for agricultural producers, Chapter 12 filings may increase. One of the requirements to get a Chapter 12 reorganization plan approved is that be filed in “good faith.” In this blog post, RFD-TV Legal Contributor Roger A. McEowen explains exactly what farmers need to know about the process.
The failure of a grain elevator can cause large problems for farmers and for the local community it serves. A farmer who knows their rights and where they stand if an elevator fails can be in a better position than those farmers who aren’t as well informed. That is the topic of today’s blog post by RFD-TV Legal Contributor Roger A. McEowen.
Financial matters in farming can be frustratingly complicated, especially when it comes to the process of filing for bankruptcy. That is the topic tackled in today’s blog post by Farm-Legal Expert Roger A. McEowen—the definition of “insolvency” for purposes of the exclusion from income of CODI.
The “farm products rule,” and the 1985 Farm Bill modification and its application – that is the topic of today’s blog post from Agri-Legal Expert Roger McEowen.
Now that Washington lawmakers have passed a 45-day stopgap, they have some breathing room to work through some hot-button topics like the high cost of the upcoming Farm Bill, which is due in large part to the funding necessary to support the Nutrition Title.
A recent news story involving a group of farmers in Mississippi reveals the potential downside of selling grain under a deferred payment contract. The risk of deferred payment ag commodity sales and what can be done for protection—that is the topic of today’s blog post.