USDA Secretary Rollins Intervenes in California Dam Dispute Over Farm Water Supplies

More than 1,100 residents and farmers have signed a letter urging Ag Secretary Brooke Rollins to step in, saying the proposal threatens irrigation supplies and long-term farm viability in the region.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD-TV) — Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins is stepping in on behalf of California farmers and ranchers amid a dispute over proposed hydroelectric dam removals that could significantly impact water supplies for agriculture. The issue centers on several hydro projects in Northern California, where Rollins says state and federal officials are prioritizing fish protections over farming operations.

Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) has proposed shutting down two dams along the Eel River, arguing that hydroelectric power generation at those sites is no longer economically viable. The utility says rising regulatory costs tied to fish safety and environmental compliance have made continued operation impractical. Under PG&E’s plan, the dams would be removed, allowing the river to return to its natural flow. While supporters argue the move would benefit fish populations and river ecosystems, local farmers warn it would eliminate a critical source of water for nearby agricultural operations.

More than 1,100 residents and farmers have signed a letter urging Secretary Rollins to intervene, saying the proposal threatens irrigation supplies and long-term farm viability in the region. In response, Rollins has filed an official notice to intervene in the process. The USDA says the move will ensure that farmers, ranchers, and rural communities have proper representation as decisions are made.

Rollins has emphasized that agricultural producers must have a seat at the table when major water and infrastructure decisions are considered, particularly in drought-prone regions where water access is already strained.

The intervention sets the stage for increased federal involvement as the future of the Eel River dams continues to be debated.

Related Stories
RFD-TV Farm Legal and Taxation expert, Roger McEowen, with the Washburn School of Law, joined us Monday to break down the changes and explain what producers should know.
North Dakota Farmers Union (NDFU) President Mark Watne joined us Monday to share his perspective on the America First Trade Promotion Program and potential implications for producers.
Duane Simpson, CEO of the National Council of Farmer Cooperatives (NCFC), joined us in Monday’s Market Day Report to share his perspective on the USDA’s plan and potential impact on producers.
Beginning Farmers and Ranchers, Crop Insurance, and a Business Planning Complication
UC Davis Professor and Extension Specialist Dr. Frank Mitloehner joined us on Friday’s Market Day Report to preview the festivities and share why this event has become such a special tradition for the ag community.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

China still has a long way to go before it meets its commitment to buy 12 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans this year.
The new WOTUS proposal narrows federal jurisdiction, restores key agricultural exclusions, and gives farmers clearer permitting rules after years of regulatory uncertainty.
UMN Extension’s Emily Krekelberg outlines today’s top farm stressors, key signs of mental health distress in rural communities, and the resources available for support.
National Pork Board Chief Sustainability Officer Jamie Burr shares a closer look at the Pork Checkoff’s Pork Cares Farm Impact Report, a research program to increase trust in the pork supply chain.
Brooks York with Agrisompo joined us on Monday’s Market Day Report with some guidance on how producers can navigate their crop insurance claims for unsold grain crops.
For many farm businesses, property taxes on business assets have become a significant and highly visible expense, threatening liquidity, discouraging investment, and creating a disproportionate burden when compared to other industries.