What is the true cost of repealing the death tax on agriculture?

“We want permanency.”

Congress is getting to work on a tax package that would extend the 2017 tax cuts.

Some ag industry members advocate for the death tax as a possible tax cut and ask for a permanent exemption for farmers and ranchers. The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association says this would protect thousands of farms.

“This is a country that is custom-built for agriculture. Everyone else in the world is jealous of what we have and because of the quality of what we have, and we’re really good at using it. The problem is as that value goes up if the tax code doesn’t reflect that, then you’re going to have a lot of people that are caught up in it. That’s one of the things we found in our tax survey is that if that death tax rolls back, we have 61% of those 1,200 survey respondents that are going to suffer from this, and that’s reflective on the whole industry. This is not a handful of people that are going to get caught up in it. If this prevents back to that $5,000,000 adjusted for inflation, if it goes back then that’s going to hit a ton of people,” according to Kent Bacus.

Bacus says that a permanent repeal of death taxes on ag land has strong support in both the House and Senate, but he believes that it is going to come down to crunching the numbers.

“We want permanency in this, but as far as, you know, Congress’s ability to pay for all of it— we don’t know. It’s still a little early to tell. I think, there’s broad support for having permanent repeal of this, but you know, as they get to those backrooms and they crunch numbers, we don’t know what that outcome is going to look like,” he notes. “But that’s why we have to come down so hard on this. We can’t start compromising on the get-go. Otherwise, you’re never going to achieve. So, we’ve taken that firm position that we need full permanent repeal of the death tax. We need this for future generations.”

He expects Congress to send a package to President Trump by the end of May, but he says that there could be some hang-ups in the Senate.

Related Stories
Longer feeding periods and weaker boxed beef prices are adding pressure to cattle markets.
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer explains how sequestration reduces ARC and PLC payments by 5.7 percent and what farmers should know when planning for payments.
USDA Under Secretary Richard Fordyce explains new crop insurance changes, including payment flexibility and expanded prevented planting coverage.
Supporters say mandatory country-of-origin labeling would improve transparency, while analysts say the proposal still faces hurdles.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Federal and state officials emphasize that surveillance, sterile fly releases, and cooperation with Mexico are vital to stop New World screwworm in the U.S.
Secretary Brooke Rollins Highlights USDA’s Readiness Ahead of Douglas Port Reopening and Continued Aggressive Response to New World Screwworm
Crop conditions in several of the nation’s top corn-producing states remain below where they were at this point last year.
The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement remains in effect, but the United States declined automatic renewal, triggering annual reviews unless the three countries later approve an extension.
Soda discusses her upcoming appearance on the Dirt Diaries podcast with host Kirbe Schnoor about mental health advocacy and Nationwide’s efforts to support the next generation of agriculture leaders.
Farm Bureau economist Dr. Faith Parum joins us to discuss USDA’s latest reports on crop acreage and grain stocks, and how they impact farm margins and trade outlook moving forward.