Firm to Farm: A New Era of WOTUS — The “Top 10" Ag Law and Tax Developments of 2025

The Supreme Court of the United States looms above a river winding through grasslands.

davidevison, kat7213 – stock.adobe.com

In 2025, the long-running saga of the “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) reached a decisive turning point, providing farmers and ranchers with the regulatory clarity that has been sought for decades. Following years of “ping-pong” rulemaking between administrations, the developments of 2025 centered on a final alignment with the Supreme Court’s landmark Sackett v. EPA[1] decision.

In late 2025, the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers unveiled a new rule that finally aligns federal oversight with the Supreme Court’s Sackett decision, effectively replacing bureaucratic ambiguity with standards visible to the naked eye.

For farmers, the 2025 rule represents a victory for property rights. The most significant shift is the adoption of a strict Relatively Permanent” standard. Federal jurisdiction is now limited to bodies of water that are standing or continuously flowing. This change explicitly excludes ephemeral features—those dry ditches and low spots that only carry water after rainfall. Previously, these features left producers vulnerable to heavy fines; today, they are firmly outside federal reach.

To account for regional differences, the rule introduces a “Wet Season” definition. While waters that flow predictably during wetter months may still be regulated, the rule requires a continuous surface connection to navigable waters. If a feature does not maintain water during the defined regional wet season, the federal government has no authority over it.

The 2025 reforms also strengthened essential exclusions. For the first time, groundwater and subsurface tile lines are explicitly excluded by rule, ensuring that vital drainage infrastructure remains a private management matter. Furthermore, Prior Converted Cropland status was simplified: land only loses its exclusion if it is abandoned for more than five years and reverts to a wetland state.

The public comment period on the proposed rule closed in early January of 2026. The agencies are reviewing the submitted comments and are working on the drafting of the final rule, which is expected to be issued sometime in the Spring or Summer of 2026.

WOTUS Comparison: 2023 vs. 2025

FeatureAmended 2023 RuleNov. 2025 Proposed Rule
Primary Standard“Relatively Permanent” but undefinedDefined: Flowing/standing year-round or during a predictable “Wet Season.”
Ephemeral StreamsCase-by-case (often regulated)Explicitly Excluded: Land that only flows after rain is non-jurisdictional.
WetlandsMust have a surface connectionTwo-Prong Test: Must (1) touch a WOTUS and (2) have surface water during the wet season.
GroundwaterGenerally excluded by practiceExplicitly Excluded by Rule: Includes tile drains and subsurface systems.
Interstate WatersRegulated because they cross linesRemoved: Must independently meet the permanence standard to be regulated.

Related Stories
Connected Nation is marking 25 years with a 25-hour livestream attempting a Guinness World Record while promoting internet literacy and rural connectivity.
Fred Nichols at Huma says growers should evaluate yield records, nutrient needs, fertilizer prices, soil health, and timing to determine the fall fertility strategy that best fits their operation.
Cattle placements fell 9% in August, while New Mexico joined USDA’s meat inspection program, potentially expanding processing options for livestock producers.
Nearly 30 million additional acres will enter the safety net beginning with the 2026 crop year.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

A botched art deal demonstrates the dangers of relying on informal understandings when money changes hands.
The concern is not whether clean water, clean air, healthy soil, and responsible stewardship are desirable. Of course they are. The concern is whether calling an environmental condition a “human right” provides a coherent legal rule.
The federal government is closer to a “Waters of the United States” definition that is narrower, more predictable, and more consistent with the Constitution—but farmers should not mistake this for the end of the WOTUS saga.
Agricultural Employers Still Face Potential Backpay Liability
Washington should not try to manufacture a lower beef price. It should create the legal, tax, and economic environment that gives American ranchers a reason to produce more beef.