UPDATED: BOI Reporting Rules—The Saga Continues

RFD-TV Legal Expert Roger McEowen with Kansas’ Washburn School of Law breaks it down in his latest Firm to Farm blog post.

court documents_AdobeStock_501810199.png

Adobe Stock

UPDATE (12/27/2024):

The Fifth Circuit has vacated its decision of Monday, Dec. 23, which restores the nationwide preliminary injunction against enforcement of the beneficial ownership information reporting rules. The merits panel of the Fifth Circuit stated in its order Thursday evening, December 26, that its decision was necessary “to preserve the constitutional status quo while the merits panel considers the parties’ weighty substantive arguments.” The court also expedited the appeal to the “next available oral argument panel,” which it appears could be the week of January 6, 2025, based upon the court’s published schedule.

Previous Article

Late today (12/23/2024), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit lifted the preliminary injunction imposed by a federal district court in Texas against the government’s enforcement of the BOI reporting rules. This means that as of now (early evening on 12/23/24), the reports must be filed by covered entities by Jan. 1, 2025. The appellate court cited the government’s authority to regulate commerce under the Commerce Clause to determine that the government was likely to prevail on the merits.

But that’s the point. The reporting requirement is not triggered on a business engaging in commerce. It’s triggered upon registering with a state office regardless of whether any commerce has been conducted.

Nevertheless, Jan. 1 is not the key date to remember — it’s now January 13, 2025. Here’s what the FINCEN has posted on its website:

“In light of a December 23, 2024, federal Court of Appeals decision, reporting companies, except as indicated below, are once again required to file beneficial ownership information with FinCEN. However, because the Department of the Treasury recognizes that reporting companies may need additional time to comply given the period when the preliminary injunction had been in effect, we have extended the reporting deadline as follows:

  • Reporting companies that were created or registered prior to January 1, 2024, have until January 13, 2025, to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN. (These companies would otherwise have been required to report by January 1, 2025.)
  • Reporting companies created or registered in the United States on or after September 4, 2024, that had a filing deadline between December 3, 2024, and December 23, 2024, have until January 13, 2025, to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN.
  • Reporting companies created or registered in the United States on or after December 3, 2024, and on or before December 23, 2024, have an additional 21 days from their original filing deadline to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN.
  • Reporting companies that qualify for disaster relief may have extended deadlines that fall beyond January 13, 2025. These companies should abide by whichever deadline falls later.
  • Reporting companies that are created or registered in the United States on or after January 1, 2025, have 30 days to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN after receiving actual or public notice that their creation or registration is effective.”

The movement to Jan. 13, 2025, will allow the new Congress to address the matter (which it should have taken care of in the year-end legislation). Of course, if an emergency writ is filed with the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court could address the matter before that. I suspect this issue is far from over.

Stay tuned…

Related Stories
RealAg Radio’s Lyndsey Smith says Canada’s budget extends farm succession tax breaks and expands ownership-transfer options, even though it excludes agriculture and forestry from the growth incentives offered to others.
Connected Nation data scientist David Nunnally says reliable internet, devices, and digital literacy connect rural residents to healthcare services and information, making broadband vital to state investments in rural healthcare.
Final grazing regulations from the Bureau of Land Management could reshape permit administration and land access for western ranchers for years to come.
Sell previously helped shape the 2002 Farm Bill and is expected to pursue a seat on the House Agriculture Committee.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

For farmers and ranchers, a dog attacking livestock is more than a nuisance — it can threaten animals, livelihoods, and years of investment — but the law generally does not recognize a blanket right to shoot a dog simply for trespassing.
EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers are considering new WOTUS definitions following the Supreme Court’s Sackett decision, with implications for farmers, ranchers and rural landowners.
Deliberately falsifying production records or other material information to obtain benefits can lead to consequences far beyond repayment. The case involving Missouri farmer Steve McBee illustrates the point.
USDA’s Harvest Fuel Relief Program could provide short-term assistance to farmers, but ranchers await clarity on payments for fuel, feed, and cattle hauling.
A government agency may have authority to regulate groundwater, but that authority does not eliminate the agency’s obligation to respect statutory limits and established property rights.
A recent decision from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas addresses an important question: Can a farmer modify a confirmed Chapter 12 plan to extend payments on secured debt beyond five years from the date the first payment under the original plan was due?
Roger McEowen examines how President Trump’s federal diesel tax relief differs from state rules and what Kansas farmers should consider before using dyed diesel on roads.
A recent Wyoming Supreme Court ruling reminds farmers and ranchers that disputes over land access are, ultimately, disputes over property rights.
A Ninth Circuit ruling says federal sovereign immunity does not automatically bar ranchers from enforcing state-adjudicated water rights.
A Lesson in Administrative Law from South Carolina
Cooper-Clark highlights a key lesson for producers and royalty owners: in oil-and-gas royalty disputes, lease language and marketing facts are crucial.
The government should exercise humility before imposing costs on an economy as complex as American agriculture. The 2026 greenhouse-gas regulatory rollback reflects that shift.