China’s Soybean ‘Glut’ Raises Questions Over U.S. Trade Deal

A Reuters report shows China has a soybean “glut,” finding stockpiles at Chinese ports are at record levels, with crushers there holding the most supplies since 2017.

NASHVILLE, TENN. (RFD-TV) — China is expected to buy more than 75 million metric tons of soybeans over the next several years, but that could all be in jeopardy, as supplies there are already running heavy.

A new Reuters report shows that China now has a soybean “glut.” They found stockpiles at Chinese ports are at record levels right now, and crushers there are holding the most supplies since 2017.

Reports show that state inventories in China currently have enough soybean supplies to meet demand for about five months.

According to White House trade officials, China pledged to buy 12 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans before the year is up, but no concrete plans have been announced.

While that soybean trade framework is in place, Ohio farmer Chris Gibbs tells us he will believe it when he sees it. Gibbs’ farm was one of the stops along the “Motorcade for Trade,” the coast-to-coast event hosted by the group Farmers for Free Trade.

“I don’t think I want to elevate it to deal right at the moment,” Gibbs said. “What we’ve got here are agreements to talk about a framework that were maybe sealed with a handshake. If we had had a trade deal, the President would have opened up one of those black binders, and his signature would have been on it. And so, I haven’t seen any ink yet. So, until I see ink — particularly out of China — I’m dubious about calling it a trade deal.”

Among the many problems facing farmers today, Gibbs said, trade has been his top issue since tensions with China began in 2018.

Ahead of the Trump-Xi meeting last month, China did buy some U.S. soybeans — about three cargo loads worth — and has since resumed purchases of some U.S. grains, including sorghum and wheat. However, in recent years, Brazil (and more recently, Argentina) has become its primary soybean supplier.

This week, both the U.S. and China dropped retaliatory port fees and reduced tariffs on many U.S. agricultural goods by 10 percent. Still, with a 13 percent tariff on U.S. soybeans to China (down from 23%), Brazil offers a better bargain in the international market.

“It still does leave Brazil as the dominant exporter on the grain side, certainly for China,” said Rich Nelson, a commodity broker at Allendale Inc., “Keep in mind, as far as pricing, if we are kind of including this 23% tariff, which still applies to U.S. products, Brazil is still a cheaper supplier right now. So, China will still buy a little bit from the U.S., but they’ll still lean on Brazil as the dominant supplier in these next few years ahead.”

According to Nelson, previously, traders believed that China faced a soybean shortfall between December and February and would rebuild government stocks. If the recent Reuters report holds, that might not be the case.

Related Stories
In a landmark ruling delivered in late 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court significantly narrowed the scope of the National Environmental Policy Act.
While short-term volatility remains a risk, softer ocean freight rates in 2026 could improve export margins.
Trade volatility and shifting export destinations increase marketing risk for producers heading into 2026.
RFD NEWS Correspondent Frank McCaffrey speaks with Texas’s Sen. Ted Cruz and Rep. Vicente Gonzalez about USMCA renegotiation and its impact on U.S.–Mexico agriculture trade.
CoBank Knowledge Exchange’s Jeff Johnston shares the group’s positive perspective on expanding data centers into rural areas and weighs the risks and rewards for those communities.
Shaun Haney joined us to discuss Canada’s new trade agreement with China, the potential impact on farmers and exporters, and what it could mean for U.S.–Canada trade relations going forward.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Traders are keeping a close eye on China’s soybean purchases as markets track export sales, shipments, and progress toward the ‘magical’ 12 million ton target promised last year.
Leadership development and bipartisan engagement remain central to advancing agriculture’s priorities in 2026.
AFBF Economist Faith Parum provides analysis and perspective on the Farmer Bridge Assistance Program—what commodity growers should know and potential remedies for producers facing crop losses where that aid falls short.
In a post to social media, Trump said Venezuela will buy American agriculture products and will use the money from oil sales to make it happen.
Federal nutrition policy is signaling a stronger demand for whole foods produced by U.S. farmers and ranchers. Consumer-facing guidance favors animal protein, but institutional demand may change little under existing saturated fat limits.
Farmer Bridge payments are being used primarily to reduce debt and protect cash flow, not drive new spending. Curt Blades with the Association of Equipment Manufacturers joined us to provide insight into the ag equipment market and the factors influencing sales.