URBANA, Ill. (RFD NEWS) — Farm conservation programs may need to account for more than seed, equipment, and labor costs. University of Illinois farm policy expert Jonathan Coppess says farm risk is part of the true cost of adopting conservation practices.
The farmdoc analysis indicates that farmers may face production, market, financial, and management risks when adopting practices such as cover crops. Those practices can provide benefits for soil health, erosion control, and nutrient loss, but they also come with a learning curve.
Cover crops are a clear example. The article says they are often established during harvest and terminated during the spring planting window, when weather and fieldwork timing are already tight. Mistakes can affect planting dates, herbicide plans, planter setup, and yield results.
They point to research showing possible short-term yield losses, including average losses of 5.5 percent for corn and 3.5 percent for soybeans in one study. Those losses may fall within crop insurance deductibles, leaving farmers to absorb them.
The policy question is whether conservation payments should better reflect those short-term risks, not just practice costs.
For more information, click here: farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/
Corey Rosenbusch with The Fertilizer Institute joined us to discuss supply chain disruptions and what farmers should watch as global tensions impact fertilizer markets.
