Cooperatives Face Pressure to Better Serve Younger Farmers

Cooperatives may need changes to attract younger producers.

anya irons farmer.png

FarmHER Anya Irons (Season 5, Episode 14)

Photo by Marji Guyler-Alaniz/FarmHER Inc.

LUBBOCK, TEXAS (RFD NEWS) — Long-standing agricultural cooperatives may need to adapt their structure and services to better align with the needs of younger producers entering the industry.

According to analysis from Oklahoma State University Extension economist Phil Kenkel, more than 23 percent of agricultural cooperatives are over 100 years old, while 77 percent have operated for more than 50 years. At the same time, about nine percent of U.S. farmers — nearly 300,000 producers — are under 35, representing a small but growing segment of the industry.

The traditional cooperative model offers advantages, including open membership and limited upfront investment through a revolving equity structure. However, that same structure can pose challenges for younger farmers, as equity payouts are deferred over multiple years and are not readily convertible to cash. That lack of liquidity may reduce the appeal for producers facing tighter financial constraints.

Participation at the governance level is another hurdle. While cooperatives often seek younger members for leadership roles, time demands from farm operations and off-farm work can limit involvement.

Despite these challenges, the relationship remains important. Younger producers often seek access to financing, markets, and new technologies, while cooperatives rely on new members to sustain growth and equity.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Cooperatives may need changes to attract younger producers.
Tony St. James, RFD NEWS Markets Specialist
Related Stories
The new rule removes prevented-plant buy-up coverage, prompting strong objections from farm groups concerned about added risk exposure.
Tight Credit, Strong Yields Define Early December Agriculture
Lawmakers and experts react to the Administration’s long-awaited announcement of “bridge” aid to stabilize farms and offset 2025 losses until expanded safety-net programs begin in 2026.
Joe Peiffer with Ag & Business Legal Strategies advises farmers on end-of-year financial planning, including preparing records, avoiding common credit mistakes, and evaluating equipment purchases for 2026.
Lewie Pugh with the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) discusses the gap in truck driver education programs and how it impacts road safety and supply chain economics.
Cattle imports from Mexico remain stalled amid the New World screwworm outbreak. At the same time, Tyson closures add pressure on Nebraska producers and markets ahead of the USDA’s upcoming Cattle on Feed Report.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Improved export prospects and higher crop prices strengthened future expectations despite continued caution about spending.
China’s renewed purchases signal improving sorghum demand at a time when export markets are otherwise uneven. Meanwhile, agriculture groups across the U.S, Canada, and Mexico want to protect close trade relations.
The Environmental Protection Agency confirms that new single-fluorinated pesticides are not PFAS and remain fully compliant with current safety standards.
Strong demand supports sweet potatoes, but grading challenges and rising costs weigh on returns for Southeastern growers.
Pressure on grain storage capacity and stronger export positioning are pushing more grain onto railroads, highways, and river systems as logistics become a key bottleneck this fall.
The Cotton-4 are pushing hard for new value chain investments. Still, many U.S. cotton producers face unsustainable losses, and weakened regional textile capacity threatens the survival of the Carolina “dirt-to-shirt” supply chain.