Cotton Must Compete on Performance and Price Discipline

Cotton demand depends on demonstrating performance and reliability buyers can rely on, not messaging alone.

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (RFD-TV) — U.S. cotton is losing market share not because of fiber quality, but because it has drifted away from competing like a commercial product in a price-driven apparel market. That’s the central warning from Robert Antoshak, Vice President of Global Strategic Sourcing & Development at Grey Matter Concepts, who argues cotton has leaned too heavily on values-based messaging while rivals win on execution.

Antoshak notes polyester gained ground through consistency, scale, and cost control — areas where sourcing teams and CFOs make decisions. In contrast, cotton is often marketed on awareness and virtue rather than measurable performance, reliability, and economics. Buyers, he emphasizes, do not “support” fibers; they select them based on spreadsheets, risk management, and sell-through results.

Antoshak says that for cotton to regain its share, it must deliver more consistent quality and prove it can compete beyond just values and branding.

“There’s a lot more synthetic fiber being consumed these days than there is natural fiber,” he said. “That’s a trend that has been stubbornly in place for, goodness gracious, probably 25 years, perhaps longer, when that slide began to occur. Much of it’s based on a combination of the appeals of synthetics because they’re easier to spin. They tend to be cheaper. It’s a more uniform product. But coupled with that, it’s not just a mill thing. A lot of brands and retailers discovered that they could use synthetics effectively in their products and then, in effect, by doing that, enhance their margins.”

Cotton’s advantage lies in its physical performance—breathability, comfort, moisture management, and wearability—especially in next-to-skin products such as tees, underwear, bedding, and workwear. Antoshak says cotton does not need to be cheaper than polyester, but it must justify any premium by reducing returns, improving durability, and protecting brand value.

He also cautions that a focus on purity limits growth. Strategic cotton blends and tighter supply-chain consistency could expand demand while reducing mill risk.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Cotton demand depends on demonstrating performance and reliability buyers can rely on, not messaging alone.
Tony St. James, RFD-TV Markets Specialist
Related Stories
Despite rising costs and growing food insecurity, meat demand remained strong in 2025 as higher-income consumers offset cutbacks elsewhere. Economists break down the K-shaped economy, upcoming USDA cattle reports, livestock production outlooks, and renewed debate over beef imports and country-of-origin labeling heading into 2026.
Corn growers are turning to ethanol, E15 expansion, and export markets to help absorb record supplies and stabilize prices. Farm leaders discuss low-carbon ethanol demand, flex-fuel vehicle challenges, input costs, and the role of USMCA as producers look for market relief in the year ahead.
The Surface Transportation Board rejects the proposed Norfolk Southern–Union Pacific merger, prompting concerns from agricultural shippers about rail consolidation, service reliability, and higher transportation costs.
Freight volatility and route selection remain critical to soybean export margins and competitiveness.
Strong balance sheets still matter, but liquidity, planning, and lender relationships are critical as ag credit tightens, according to analysis from AgAmerica Lending.
Protein-driven dairy growth is boosting beef supply potential, creating an opening to support rural jobs and ground beef availability.
U.S. agriculture entered the week with mixed signals as weather, logistics, and markets shaped early-year decisions. Here is a regional breakdown of domestic crop and livestock production for the week of Monday, Jan. 19, 2026.
While short-term volatility remains a risk, softer ocean freight rates in 2026 could improve export margins.
Trade volatility and shifting export destinations increase marketing risk for producers heading into 2026.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Let’s meet an inspiring young farmer leading the Tennessee FFA this year, but now has his sights set on the National stage.
Cindy Kovar with AgriSafe joined us on Monday’s Market Day Report to talk about road safety and agriculture as we age.
Higher tariffs may shield some U.S. crops but risk retaliation, lost markets, and higher costs for growers. The WTO disputes highlight the fragile balance between trade policy, farm exports, and input supply chains.
USMEF CEO Dan Halstrom joined us on Monday’s Market Day Report for his analysis on the U.S.-Taiwan trade agreement, which includes big bucks for U.S. Beef.
Record U.S. sorghum crop faces weak demand as China slashes imports, while corn farmers warn of rising costs, shrinking margins, and global market pressures.
Fewer cattle on feed suggest smaller slaughter numbers this winter, which could support strong prices if beef demand holds firm.