NASHVILLE, Tenn. (RFD-TV) — The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2022 decision to register the herbicides Enlist One and Enlist Duo through 2029 is now under direct legal attack, with environmental groups asking a federal court to revoke both labels entirely. The lawsuit argues that EPA failed to meet the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act standard requiring pesticides to avoid “unreasonable adverse effects” on the environment.
If the court sides with plaintiffs, both Enlist products — widely used on 2,4-D-resistant corn, soybeans, and cotton across 34 states — could come off the market.
According to Brigit Rollins, a Staff Attorney with the National Agricultural Law Center, the challenge centers on three allegations: that EPA understated environmental costs, overstated weed-control benefits, and relied on ineffective mitigation measures.
Plaintiffs say EPA used outdated 2018–2019 usage data and ignored the rapid expansion of Enlist technologies. They also argue EPA overstated Enlist’s role in managing resistant weeds, claiming many farmers rely on Enlist alone rather than pairing it with additional chemistries. They further contend that EPA’s new mitigation tools — including a 30-foot drift buffer and a point-based runoff “pick list” — are insufficient, noting research showing 2,4-D can drift farther and runoff controls may not require meaningful management changes.
A ruling to vacate the labels would immediately disrupt broadleaf weed management in major corn, soybean, and cotton states and could ripple through other crop protection products. Because Enlist One and Enlist Duo were among the first herbicides to receive EPA’s new mitigation language, the court’s decision will also shape how future labels apply drift and runoff safeguards.
A decision upholding EPA’s approach, however, would reinforce the agency’s newer mitigation tools and provide regulatory stability for similar products.
Farm-Level Takeaway: A court decision that overturns Enlist labels would remove two major herbicides from use and reshape EPA’s future mitigation policies for other pesticides.
Tony St. James, RFD-TV Markets Specialist
Rep. Michelle Fischbach shares her appreciation for rural communities and outlines how the Working Families Tax Cut is aimed to support farm families on RFD-TV’s Champions of Rural America.
December 04, 2025 01:31 PM
·
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer has developed a detailed calculator to help producers navigate the program’s requirements. He joined us on Thursday’s Market Day Report to explain how it works.
December 04, 2025 01:20 PM
·
While the 2018 Farm Bill received an extension under the “One, Big, Beautiful Bill” Act, the National Pork Producers Council wants lawmakers to do more to support the sector.
December 04, 2025 11:27 AM
·
WTO gauges point to agricultural raw materials trade growing more slowly than overall goods, reinforcing the need to manage export risk and monitor policy shifts closely.
December 03, 2025 03:46 PM
·
Dr. Jeffrey Gold, President of the University of Nebraska, joined us to break down what telehealth entails and which conditions can be managed through remote appointments.
December 03, 2025 02:17 PM
·
Improved export prospects and higher crop prices strengthened future expectations despite continued caution about spending.
December 03, 2025 01:52 PM
·
While the agriculture industry hoped details on proposed “bridge” payments for farmers would be released this week, Ag Secretary Brook Rollins said the USDA is still working with the White House on the finer points.
December 03, 2025 01:36 PM
·
Federal lawyers submitted a brief this week backing Bayer’s argument that federal laws governing herbicides like Roundup should prevent lawsuits over the popular chemical.
December 03, 2025 12:08 PM
·
The Environmental Protection Agency confirms that new single-fluorinated pesticides are not PFAS and remain fully compliant with current safety standards.
December 03, 2025 11:00 AM
·
