EPA Deregulation Push Draws Focus From Agriculture

Regulatory changes may influence farm costs and operations.

The Supreme Court of the United States looms above a river winding through grasslands.

davidevison, kat7213 – stock.adobe.com

LUBBOCK, TEXAS (RFD NEWS) — A sweeping deregulatory agenda outlined by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin is drawing attention across farm country as producers and rural communities weigh the potential impacts on energy costs, land-use policy, and regulatory compliance. The agency says recent actions aim to reduce costs and expand flexibility while maintaining environmental protections.

EPA highlighted the reconsideration of multiple federal rules affecting the energy, transportation, and manufacturing sectors, as well as the ongoing review of a new definition of Waters of the United States (WOTUS). Agency leaders say the effort supports cooperative federalism and could ease regulatory burdens for farmers, ranchers, and rural businesses.

Operationally, energy policy shifts tied to power plants, oil and gas development, and emissions standards could affect fuel and fertilizer costs for agricultural producers. EPA also extended timelines for certain methane-related compliance rules, which officials say will reduce regulatory costs for energy operations serving rural regions.

Regionally, rural communities that depend heavily on agriculture, manufacturing, and energy production could see the most direct impacts. EPA also cited expanded coordination with states on permitting and prescribed fire use, which may influence land management practices across farm and ranch areas.

Looking ahead, producers will closely monitor upcoming rulemakings and public comment periods, particularly decisions affecting water policy, emissions standards, and energy markets that shape operating costs across agriculture.

Related Stories
Sen. Deb Fischer reintroduces the HAULS Act to update hours-of-service exemptions and definitions affecting livestock and agricultural haulers. She joins us on Market Day Report to share more about her proposed legislation.
According to multiple reports, Sen. Amy Klobuchar is considering a bid for Minnesota governor. If elected, this would open a key seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee.
Dr. Seth Meyer Concludes Service; Dr. Justin Benavidez Appointed USDA Chief Economist
Last year was a busy year for pesticide litigation in the United States. At No. 10, it kicks off RFD-TV Legal Expert Roger McEowen’s list of the “Top 10” Agricultural Law and Tax Developments of 2025.
On a spreadsheet, it looks like the ultimate way to harvest extra profit. But in the eyes of the IRS—as RFD-TV Farm Legal & Tax Expert Roger McEowen explains—this “tax-free” bank can quickly turn into a field full of weeds.
USDA data indicates that 13.7 percent of U.S. households experienced food insecurity in 2024, the highest rate since 2014, even as most households remained food secure.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Strong plant output and rising exports contrast with softer domestic blending demand, suggesting margins are poised for volatility.
Milk output is rising, but steep drops in Class I–IV prices are tightening margins heading into 2026.
Tight cattle supplies continue to drive lower beef output despite heavier weights.
Weaker U.S. dairy prices come as value-added exports expand and ingredient inventories tighten, creating mixed market signals for producers.
WTO gauges point to agricultural raw materials trade growing more slowly than overall goods, reinforcing the need to manage export risk and monitor policy shifts closely.
Improved export prospects and higher crop prices strengthened future expectations despite continued caution about spending.