Executive Order Targets Fertilizer and Herbicide Supply Chains

President Donald Trump signed an executive order this week to accelerate domestic production of phosphorus and glyphosate, signaling that farm input availability is now treated as a national security risk.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD NEWS) — Farm input availability and food security moved into national defense policy Wednesday after President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at protecting domestic supplies of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides. The White House argues that both products are critical for national and food security.

The order invokes the Defense Production Act of 1950 and gives the Secretary of Agriculture authority to prioritize contracts, allocate materials, and direct production to ensure an adequate supply. Federal officials say the materials are essential not only for military technology but also for crop production and livestock feed.

USDA will now determine production priorities and issue rules to maintain domestic output while protecting the viability of U.S. manufacturers.

Elemental phosphorus is a key ingredient in fertilizers and a precursor used to manufacture glyphosate herbicides. The Administration noted the United States currently has only one domestic producer and imports more than 6 million kilograms annually, creating vulnerability if the supply is disrupted.

The order warns that restricted access to glyphosate would lower yields, raise production costs, and pressure food prices — particularly significant during already tight farm margins. It also links phosphorus supply to semiconductors, batteries, and other defense technologies.

Glyphosate is also a key ingredient in the popular herbicide Roundup.

Trump’s order also follows an announcement earlier this week from Monsanto, a subsidiary of Bayer, proposing a $7.5 billion class settlement to resolve past and future claims against the company alleging long-term exposure to the chemical leads to increased rates of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Now, lawmakers and environmental and ag industry groups are starting to weigh in.

House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn “GT” Thompson praised the move, calling it an important step toward maintaining access to key crop inputs — but others are not sold on it.

The Environmental Working Group calls the executive order a “shocking betrayal” to anyone living or working near farm fields where glyphosate is used.

Related Stories
“We can finally put into place rules that will have some staying power, which will give certainty to landowners across the country.”
Secretary Rollins has renamed the program the ‘Advancing Markets for Producers’ initiative
Related Stories
Farm legal and taxation expert Roger McEowen discusses tariffs’ impacts on agriculture, deferred payment contracts, tax easement issues, and the rise in warrantless searches on farms and ranches.
“Whole milk is not the problem, whole milk is part of the solution.”

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Rabobank’s outlook signals a tightening margin environment, emphasizing the need for cost control, trade stability, and clearer policy signals heading into 2026.
Treat succession like any major crop — plan early, document clearly, and calibrate cash flow so the next generation can succeed.
Farm Bureau Economist Faith Parum discusses key outcomes from the U.S.-China trade agreement and the benefits of expanding trade across Southeast Asia.
Chris Bliley with Growth Energy discusses ongoing concerns about U.S. ethanol exports and the expansion of market access promised under the Phase One deal between the U.S. and China.
“It does not extinguish right away here — in any sort of sense — the real profitability concerns and people’s ability to pay bills and get to the other side of this in the very short term. This is where the skepticism builds.”
U.S. Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) shares his perspective on the U.S.-China trade developments and their potential impact on American producers, farmers, and ranchers.