Farm Bill Debate Continues Amid Sharp Policy Divisions

Farm bill negotiations remain unsettled, leaving producers waiting for updated federal support programs.

Stark cloudy weather over empty exterior view of the US Capitol Building in Washington DC, USA_Photo by lazyllama via Adobe Stock.jpg

Photo by lazyllama via Adobe Stock

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD NEWS) — The House Agriculture Committee spent more than five hours Tuesday marking up the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026, with lawmakers scheduled to resume debate Wednesday as work continues on updating federal farm policy.

Committee Chairman Glenn “GT” Thompson of Pennsylvania said the legislation reflects feedback from 43 states and aims to modernize farm programs that have remained largely unchanged since the last Farm Bill passed in 2018. Thompson said the proposal expands producer access to credit, strengthens risk-management tools, supports conservation programs, and invests in rural economic development.

Ranking Member Angie Craig of Minnesota criticized the measure, describing it as a limited proposal that fails to address declining farm incomes, rising production costs, and lost export markets. Craig also said the legislation does not include policies such as year-round E15 fuel sales or provisions she believes would strengthen food assistance programs.

Supporters of the bill argue that farm programs remain essential for producers facing disasters and market volatility. Oklahoma Congressman Frank Lucas said livestock disaster assistance and other safety-net programs are critical when producers face losses from events such as recent wildfires in the Southern Plains.

Congress previously approved Farm Bill legislation in committee during 2024, but the measure never reached the House floor. Lawmakers have since passed two temporary extensions of the 2018 Farm Bill while negotiations continue on a new multi-year policy framework.

Related Stories
An import lag for ground beef will likely look different than last year’s egg shortage. The difference comes down to biosecurity and market flexibility.
The WASDE/Crop Production combo will be the first full read on supply, demand, and yield that could move basis and hedging plans since the government shutdown more than a month ago.
U.S. Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-SD) shares his outlook on the developing U.S.-China Trade agreement, and the ongoing impact of the federal government shutdown—now stretching past four weeks—on rural communities and producers.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Lawmakers are pressing for answers on how Washington’s “managed trade” approach — keeping leverage through long-term tariffs — will affect farmers, global markets, and future export opportunities.
Beef industry groups seem to agree — market-based pricing, not federal intervention, best supports rancher livelihoods and long-term beef supply stability.
Cattle groups say additional imports would offer little relief for consumers but could erode rancher confidence as the industry begins to rebuild herds.
Harvest Pace, Logistics, and Input Costs Drive Fall Decisions
With China halting U.S. soybean purchases and talks tied to broader strategic issues, growers face renewed export uncertainty.
Talks highlight the widening role of agriculture in U.S.–India trade policy, though neither side appears ready for major concessions before tariff issues and oil imports are resolved.