Farm Prices Received Rose in March, But Margins Stayed Tight

March brought better prices for several commodities, but rising fuel and feed costs kept margins under pressure.

Model house with a bunch of paperwork and person signing a document in the background

The model house on paperwork symbolizing real estate investment and planning decisions.

Studio Nova - stock.adobe.com

LUBBOCK, TEXAS (RFD NEWS) — Prices received by U.S. farmers moved higher in March, but input costs also kept climbing, leaving the overall margin picture still tight. USDA said the March Prices Received Index for agricultural production rose 1.1 percent from February to 131.5, while the Prices Paid Index increased 0.5 percent to 160.4.

Crop prices were mixed. USDA said corn averaged $4.27 per bushel in March, up 16 cents from February, soybeans averaged $11.10, up 50 cents, and all wheat averaged $5.52, up 40 cents. Rice moved the other direction, falling 60 cents from February to $11.70 per hundredweight.

Livestock and dairy prices also shifted unevenly. The March beef cattle price averaged $236.00 per hundredweight, down $3.00 from February but up $34.00 from a year earlier. Hogs averaged $68.70, up $2.80 from February, and all milk averaged $19.70, up $1.40 from the previous month.

On the cost side, USDA said higher diesel, complete feed, gasoline, and LP gas prices more than offset declines in feeder cattle, concentrates, herbicides, and insecticides. The ratio of prices received to prices paid improved from 81 in February to 83 in March, but it remained well below 97 a year earlier.

The report leaves producers with a mixed outlook. March prices improved in several major categories, but higher input costs continued to limit the relief farmers actually saw.

Farm-Level Takeaway: March brought better prices for several commodities, but rising fuel and feed costs kept margins under pressure.
Tony St. James, RFD News Markets Specialist
Related Stories
A rapidly intensifying winter storm is expected to develop into a bomb cyclone this weekend, affecting the Southeast, southern Virginia, and potentially parts of the mid‑Atlantic and New England.
Strong blending demand continues to support ethanol use even as production and exports fluctuate.
AFBF Economist Danny Munch shares a closer look at the dairy market and the forces impacting producers today.
Eliza Petry joins the RFD News team with a strong connection to agriculture and a commitment to covering the people and issues that matter most to rural America.
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer helps producers navigate farm program payments and understand the key details farmers need to know.
Early indications suggest the U.S. cattle industry may be nearing the end of its liquidation phase. Oklahoma State University livestock economist Dr. Derrell Peel says the industry could be at or near the cyclical low.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Ethanol markets remain mixed — weaker production and blend rates are being partially balanced by stronger exports as winter demand patterns take shape.
Tariff relief may soften grocery prices, but it also intensifies competition for U.S. fruit, vegetable, and beef producers as cheaper imports regain market share.
Strong U.S. yields and steady demand leave most major crops well supplied, keeping price pressure in place unless usage strengthens or weather shifts outlooks.
Retail competition and improved supplies are helping offset food inflation, pushing Thanksgiving meal costs modestly lower despite higher prices for beef, eggs, and dairy.
While agriculture doesn’t predict every recession, the sector’s long history of turning down before the broader economy
The ACRE Act modestly reduces farmland borrowing costs now, with more savings possible once federal guidance clarifies which loans qualify.