Federal Government Enters Partial Shutdown as Farm Bill Talks Move Forward

House Agriculture Committee Chairman “GT” Thompson is pushing a “Farm Bill 2.0.”

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD NEWS) — A partial government shutdown is currently in effect in Washington, though several key agencies tied to agriculture remain unaffected—for now.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), along with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Department of the Interior, and the Environmental Protection Agency, continues to operate under funding plans finalized last year and signed into law following the previous shutdown.

Over the weekend, the U.S. Senate passed a spending package that would fund the government through September. However, the House was not in session to take up the measure. Lawmakers returned to Capitol Hill Monday morning, and House Speaker Mike Johnson told Meet the Press he is confident the partial shutdown will be resolved by Tuesday.

Farm Bill 2.0 in Focus for February

Meanwhile, attention is turning to the Farm Bill, where lawmakers are eyeing a late February markup.

House Agriculture Committee Chairman “GT” Thompson is pushing what is being called a “Farm Bill 2.0,” aimed at addressing priorities left out of the broader legislative package passed last year. A proposed “skinny Farm Bill” could advance items such as E15 expansion, additional farmer assistance, and rural development initiatives.

Committee members caution that cost estimates and the recent passing of Congressman Doug LaMalfa could slow progress. Still, House Republicans say they are hopeful a floor vote could take place before the Easter recess.

On the Senate side, the Agriculture Committee may soon see a shift in leadership, depending on the outcome of Senator Amy Klobuchar’s run for Minnesota governor. If Klobuchar is elected, Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey could step in as the committee’s top Democrat.

Booker would bring a different perspective to the role as a vegan and supporter of conservation-focused programs. Republican members say they have worked with Booker in the past and expect him to continue engaging on agricultural issues despite philosophical differences.

As budget negotiations and Farm Bill discussions unfold, lawmakers say the coming weeks will be critical for setting the direction of agricultural policy in 2026 and beyond.

RFD News will continue to monitor developments out of Washington, D.C., and any potential impacts on agriculture. Updates will be available on Market Day Report, Rural Evening News, and our online platforms.

Related Stories
“We can finally put into place rules that will have some staying power, which will give certainty to landowners across the country.”
Secretary Rollins has renamed the program the ‘Advancing Markets for Producers’ initiative
Farm legal and taxation expert Roger McEowen discusses tariffs’ impacts on agriculture, deferred payment contracts, tax easement issues, and the rise in warrantless searches on farms and ranches.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Texas Ag Commissioner Sid Miller warns horse owners after EHV-1 cases linked to the Waco WPRA Finals. Horses linked to recent Waco events should be isolated and closely monitored, as early action is critical to stopping the spread of EHV-1.
One trader said the products entering the U.S. are primarily grind and trim, noting that the volume and type of beef, on its own, should not cause a major disruption. However, he says fund traders are reacting heavily to headlines rather than market realities.
Olivia Bury, AgriSafe Network Behavioral Health Coordinator, shares about AgriSafe Network’s resources created to support farmers and rural Americans.
Jael Cruikshank, the newly elected Western Region Vice President, shares her story on this week’s FFA Today.
Shaun Haney, host of RealAg Radio, provides the latest insight into the timing, expectations, and broader considerations of the potential aid package, despite increasing exports to China.
Farm legal expert Roger McEowen reviews the history of the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule and outlines how shifting definitions across multiple administrations have created regulatory confusion for landowners.