Following a recent county vote, the voices show that Colorado wants to slow down the next wolf reintroduction

Colorado’s wolf introduction efforts continue to raise concerns within the ag industry with reports of significant impacts on ranchers in the western part of the state.

The Colorado Cattleman’s Association is addressing concerns over state agency planning.

According to Tom Harrington, “They did look ahead and make sure that they were prepared for the problems that were going to ensue. How they were going to deal with compensation claims, the non-lethal deterrence, and what those costs were, not only to purchase them and get them out there but installed and maintained. The Range Rider Program was kind of an afterthought, that does seem to work in some situations. The extensive range in Colorado is just not very conducive to the non-lethals and they’ve proven that the non-lethal deterrents all seem to work for a time, but very, short time. The wolves figure out that they can work around it.”

The result of a vote at the recent Colorado Counties Incorporated meeting left no question on how county commissioners feel about the next wolf release.

“Sixty-three of 64 counties voted to pause the next reintroduction. The only county that didn’t was Denver County,” Harrington added. “He should have taken that as a pretty good strong vote that maybe they need to slow down on this.”

Harrington is also pushing back on claims from Governor Jared Polis, who has been criticized for comments he made regarding the budgeting issues surrounding the introduction.

Related Stories
Leadership development and bipartisan engagement remain central to advancing agriculture’s priorities in 2026.
This simple but powerful tool from Nutrien enables farmers to keep track of highly personalized input costs and expenses involved in running their operation.
Expanding chicken supplies are likely to keep prices under pressure in early 2026 despite steady demand growth.
Prompt removal of Christmas trees and careful handling of decorations reduce winter fire risk during an already high-demand season for emergency services.
Reduced winter placements indicate tighter fed cattle supplies and greater leverage during peak-demand months.
AFBF Economist Faith Parum provides analysis and perspective on the Farmer Bridge Assistance Program—what commodity growers should know and potential remedies for producers facing crop losses where that aid falls short.