Grain Inspections Ease as Soybean Pace Slows

Corn and wheat exports remain a demand bright spot, while soybeans are transitioning into a more typical late-winter shipping slowdown.

imports business trade shipping containers port_adobe stock.png

Photo by Fotolia via Adobe Stock

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD NEWS) — U.S. grain export inspections softened during the week ending January 15, with soybeans posting a notable pullback while corn and wheat remained seasonally solid. USDA Market News data show total grain inspections of roughly 133 million bushels, down from the prior week but still ahead of the same period last year.

Corn inspections totaled about 58.4 million bushels, slightly below the previous week yet well above year-ago levels. Marketing-year-to-date corn inspections now stand near 1.18 billion bushels, reflecting strong early-season movement supported by competitive Gulf and Pacific Northwest shipments.

Soybean inspections fell sharply to roughly 49.1 million bushels, down from the previous week’s pace. Despite the slowdown, marketing-year-to-date soybean inspections total about 710 million bushels, with China remaining the dominant destination through Gulf and Pacific Northwest ports. Japan, Germany, Egypt, and Mexico also accounted for meaningful weekly volumes.

Wheat inspections improved week to week, totaling about 14.4 million bushels. Cumulative wheat inspections for the current marketing year are approximately 587 million bushels, running ahead of last year’s pace. Hard red spring and soft red winter wheat led shipments, with strong activity in the Pacific Northwest and the Gulf.

Sorghum inspections reached roughly 6.9 million bushels for the week, bringing marketing-year-to-date shipments to about 46.4 million bushels, slightly behind last year.

Overall inspection trends suggest export demand remains supportive but uneven, with soybeans entering a more seasonal slowdown while corn and wheat continue to benefit from steady global buying interest.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Corn and wheat exports remain a demand bright spot, while soybeans are transitioning into a more typical late-winter shipping slowdown.
Tony St. James, RFD NEWS Markets Specialist
Related Stories
Lower freight costs helped sustain export demand amid a challenging pricing environment.
Producers across the country spent the week balancing spring planning with tight margins and uneven moisture outlooks. Input purchasing stayed cautious, while marketing and cash-flow decisions remained front and center for many operations.
Income support helps, but farm finances remain tight heading into 2026.
Federal assistance has helped, but the most recent row-crop losses remain on producers’ balance sheets.
OOIDA’s Lewie Pugh discusses the EPA’s new Right to Repair guidance and other regulatory developments impacting the trucking and agriculture industries.
Rebuilding domestic textiles depends on automation and vertical integration, not tariffs or legacy manufacturing models.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Low prices are painful now, but production response could support stronger milk markets later in 2026.
The U.S. trade deal with Argentina creates new export opportunities for U.S. livestock and crop producers but also raises competitive concerns.
Policies aimed at ground beef prices may primarily reshape dairy incentives rather than deliver lasting consumer savings.
More flexible export financing could strengthen demand in emerging markets and support higher U.S. agricultural exports.
Incremental trade clarity with India could support select U.S. ag exports, but major gains hinge on future market-access talks.
The phone call injected optimism into the soybean market, but actual Chinese buying and its timing will ultimately determine the extent of U.S. agricultural export benefits.