House Ag Committee approves $300 billion in cuts to nutrition spending

House Ag.jpg

Photo via Official Twitter

The House Ag Committee spent all day and night voting on President Trump’s tax cut bill, also known as the “One Big, Beautiful Bill,” specifically marking up language tied to SNAP and farm security.

Tonight, they voted 29-25 to advance legislation that cuts $300 billion in food aid spending, according to Politico.

The vote now goes to the House Budget Committee before a full floor vote.

Chair GT Thompson explained the GOP strategy.
“More specifically, our reconciliation instructions provide the opportunity to restore integrity to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP, to make sure that this essential program works for the most vulnerable and functions as Congress as it is intended. Additionally, it allows for vital investment with our Farm Bill programs addressing immediate needs for farmers, ranchers, and rural communities. By putting the farm back in the Farm Bill, Congress will be better able to deliver a full, long-term reauthorization of a highly effective Farm Bill.

Story via Grace Yarrow with Politico

Related Stories
Nutrition policy shifts may influence retail demand across agriculture.
The debate now matters as much as the policy — market rules and regulatory clarity depend on whether Congress can finish the bill this year.
Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law reviews key highlights from the House Agriculture Committee’s latest farm bill proposal.
President Donald Trump speaks at the World Economic Forum in Davos, addressing SNAP spending, tariff threats against Europe, market reactions, and the upcoming USMCA review.
House Agriculture Committee Democrats are calling for action on the Farm and Family Relief Act, warning that proposed SNAP cost shifts to states could reduce food assistance for low-income families amid ongoing tariffs and trade disruptions that continue to strain U.S. farmers.
Federal nutrition policy is signaling a stronger demand for whole foods produced by U.S. farmers and ranchers. Consumer-facing guidance favors animal protein, but institutional demand may change little under existing saturated fat limits.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) economist Bernt Nelson provides an updated outlook on the current U.S. cattle market.
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer discusses the status of USDA disaster aid, including delays to Stage 2 of the SDRP program, and what farmers should watch for as lawmakers negotiate an end to the government shutdown.
Taryn Fischels, Product Marketing Manager for Precision Upgrades at John Deere, joins us to share a sneak peek of her chat with FarmHER’s Kirbe Schnoor on the Dirt Diaries podcast.
Sen. Roger Marshall explains which types of beef are imported into the United States, how there’s room for new imports, and logical reasons for current high prices.
U.S. Senator Deb Fischer (R-NE) discusses the USDA’s new cattle plan, ethanol policy, and the broader challenges ahead for rural America.
Jacob Wheeler and Dustin Connell of Team O’Reilly Auto Parts took an early lead and never let go, finishing atop SCORETRACKER® with 64 pounds, 8 ounces on 42 scorable bass.