House Ag Democrats Push Farm and Family Relief Act as SNAP Cost Shift Raises Alarm

House Agriculture Committee Democrats are calling for action on the Farm and Family Relief Act, warning that proposed SNAP cost shifts to states could reduce food assistance for low-income families amid ongoing tariffs and trade disruptions that continue to strain U.S. farmers.

Shelly_Muzzall_01_21_19_USA_WA_Three_Sisters_Farm_012.jpg

3 Sisters Family Farm (FarmHER S4, Ep. 9)

FarmHer, Inc.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD NEWS) — House Agriculture Committee Democrats are renewing calls for congressional action on food assistance and farm policy, warning that proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and ongoing trade disruptions could harm both farmers and low-income families.

At a January press event, Ranking Member Angie Craig (D-MN) and other committee Democrats unveiled the framework of the Farm and Family Relief Act, legislation they say is designed to ease financial pressure on family farmers while protecting access to food assistance. Democrats argue that tariffs and trade uncertainty have contributed to significant losses in farm income, while recent SNAP policy changes risk shifting costs to states and reducing benefits for vulnerable populations.

“Americans know that life is simply more expensive today than when President Trump took office last year,” Craig said. “Family farmers have been bankrupted by Trump’s ill-conceived trade wars, and state governments are facing the terrifying reality that they may need to let millions of residents go hungry because of his heartless cuts to food assistance. The Farm and Family Relief Act doesn’t pick winners and losers. It helps all Americans by reigning in the tariffs that have increased our cost of living, giving states breathing room to adapt to shifting SNAP rules, and providing an economic lifeline to farmers so they can continue to feed our nation and the world. Unlike the Trump administration, which loves to pick winners and losers, the Farm and Family Relief Act has provisions that help all Americans – and only as a package can we deliver true relief to the American people.”

Those concerns are echoed in a new analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), which warns that a pending SNAP cost-sharing requirement would, for the first time, force states to pay a portion of food benefit costs beginning in 2027. The policy ties state costs to payment error rates, a move CBPP says could saddle many states with hundreds of millions of dollars in new expenses each year.

According to the report, states facing higher costs could be forced to cut SNAP benefits, limit eligibility, or divert funding from other essential services. CBPP is urging Congress to delay the cost shift, citing administrative challenges, disruptions from the recent government shutdown, and reduced federal support for SNAP operations.

Democrats say the Farm and Family Relief Act would provide flexibility for states, protect food assistance for children, seniors, and veterans, and help stabilize rural communities amid economic strain. Without action, they warn, both producers and consumers could feel the impact through higher costs and reduced access to food.

Related Stories
How the Public Trust Doctrine Threatens Agricultural Property Rights
Reducing mental stress and focusing on controllable actions can improve decision-making in high-pressure environments, according to Hollywood actor and former Calif Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Tight fed supplies shift margin risk to packers, strengthening cattle price leverage but increasing volatility.
Expanding chicken supplies are likely to keep prices under pressure in early 2026 despite steady demand growth.
Prompt removal of Christmas trees and careful handling of decorations reduce winter fire risk during an already high-demand season for emergency services.
Reduced winter placements indicate tighter fed cattle supplies and greater leverage during peak-demand months.
In a post to social media, Trump said Venezuela will buy American agriculture products and will use the money from oil sales to make it happen.
Federal nutrition policy is signaling a stronger demand for whole foods produced by U.S. farmers and ranchers. Consumer-facing guidance favors animal protein, but institutional demand may change little under existing saturated fat limits.
Farmer Bridge payments are being used primarily to reduce debt and protect cash flow, not drive new spending. Curt Blades with the Association of Equipment Manufacturers joined us to provide insight into the ag equipment market and the factors influencing sales.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD-TV and The Cowboy Channel. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, adding a decade of experience in the digital side of broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

China’s beef policy risk stems from domestic volatility, making export demand inherently unstable. Jake Charleston with Specialty Risk Insurance offers his perspective on cattle markets, risk management, and producer sentiment.
USDA flash corn sales, Cattle on Feed and Inventory reports, and beef packer antitrust concerns dominate January agricultural market news.
U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins said permanent access to the higher ethanol blend would provide farmers with much-needed certainty while supporting domestic crop demand.
Food prices increased in December, but not as much as expected, according to the latest Consumer Price Index from the U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics.
Lewis Williamson with HTS Commodities joined us to provide analysis on the January WASDE report and expectations for grain markets going forward.
Market reaction was bearish for corn and soybeans, with analysts noting that abundant supplies amid tepid demand could keep price pressure on agricultural commodities.