Interest Rate Relief Expected to be Slow and Limited in 2026

Modest rate relief may come late in 2026, but borrowing costs are likely to stay elevated.

interest rates_financial graph on technology abstract background_Photo by monsitj via Adobe Stock_190463205.jpg

Photo by monsitj via Adobe Stock

LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD NEWS) — U.S. interest rate relief in 2026 is likely to be modest, with only limited cuts expected as the Federal Reserve balances easing inflation against labor market conditions. According to an analysis by Andrew Wright, an assistant professor and extension economist with Texas A&M AgriLife Extension, the Federal Reserve is signaling caution rather than a rapid shift toward lower borrowing costs.

After aggressive rate hikes in 2022 and gradual easing beginning in late 2024, the federal funds rate held mostly steady through 2025 before modest cuts resumed in the fall. The Federal Open Market Committee’s latest projections show broad agreement on economic growth and inflation, but less consensus on how far rates should fall. The median outlook suggests a single quarter-point rate cut sometime in the second half of 2026.

If that path holds, the federal funds rate would likely move from roughly 3.5–3.75 percent early in the year to around 3.25–3.5 percent later in 2026. Agricultural lending rates typically track 4–5 percentage points above the federal funds rate, implying operating loan rates could remain in the mid-to-upper 7 percent range, with real estate and intermediate loans slightly lower.

Wright notes that actual borrowing costs will continue to vary widely based on lender relationships, balance sheets, and borrower risk profiles, keeping credit discipline front and center for producers.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Modest rate relief may come late in 2026, but borrowing costs are likely to stay elevated.
Tony St. James, RFD NEWS Markets Specialist
Related Stories
U.S. Farmers Face Shifting Harvest Pace, Basis, and Input Costs
Lewis Williamson with HTS Commodities joined RFD-TV’s Market Day Report to share insight into what’s happening on the ground and in the markets.
Even in this strong market, some beef producers are leaving money on the table by not following proven marketing practices.
New U.S. fees on Chinese-owned and built ships took effect overnight, marking the latest escalation in maritime trade tensions between Washington and Beijing.
President Trump is expected to press Argentina to take a tougher stance on China in exchange for political and economic support.
Treat storage as risk management and logistics, and budget to break even since export growth is unlikely to absorb bigger U.S. corn and soybean crops.
For rural borrowers, freeing up community-bank balance sheets could mean steadier home loans, operating lines, and ag real-estate financing as winter planning ramps up.
President Trump has long supported a direct line from Alberta’s oil fields to the Midwest.
The American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) is urging Congress and the Trump Administration to act quickly on behalf of American agriculture.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

NCBA CEO Colin Woodall says more conversations need to occur with stakeholders present surrounding President Trump’s proposal to lower consumer beef prices with Argentinian imports.
Corn and wheat inspections outpaced last year, but soybean movement remains seasonally active yet behind, keeping basis and freight dynamics in focus by corridor.
Lawmakers are pressing for answers on how Washington’s “managed trade” approach — keeping leverage through long-term tariffs — will affect farmers, global markets, and future export opportunities.
Beef industry groups seem to agree — market-based pricing, not federal intervention, best supports rancher livelihoods and long-term beef supply stability.
Cattle groups say additional imports would offer little relief for consumers but could erode rancher confidence as the industry begins to rebuild herds.
Harvest Pace, Logistics, and Input Costs Drive Fall Decisions