Mexico Agrees to Water Payments Under 1944 Treaty, but South Texas Farmers Still Waiting on Relief

South Texas farmers say water shortages continue despite Mexico’s renewed payments under the 1944 Water Treaty.

WESLACO, TEXAS (RFD NEWS) — Last week, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins announced that the United States and Mexico reached a new agreement regarding water deliveries under the 1944 U.S.-Mexico Water Treaty.

“We have struck another deal with the country of Mexico with regard to the 1944 U.S., Mexico Water Treaty,” Rollins said. “Not surprisingly, the United States has consistently met its water obligation under that treaty. But for the past six years, and I was saying even before — when I worked for another Governor, Governor Rick Perry 25 years ago — we were negotiating with Mexico on this issue because they failed to — again — meet their obligations.”

Under the agreement, Mexico is expected to deliver 202,000 acre-feet of water before March, with additional payments planned.

But while the deal marks progress on paper, many in the South Texas agricultural community say relief has yet to materialize.

“There still are issues trying to get the water here,” said John Norman, a South Texas agriculture consultant. “As to my understanding, the water district still have not made allotments to the growers because they still don’t have enough water to get that in there where they can count on the water being there when they need it. So yes, the water supply is one of the biggest issues that we are dealing with down here.”

Without dependable irrigation water, farmers are facing mounting financial strain.

“Cotton prices, for instance, have gone down to 62 cents a pound right at this point in time,” Norman said. “If we had it to sell, which we don’t, we will have in July. But the thing is, that’s about 20 to 25 cents a pound too short for growers to make any money. Same thing on grain sorghum prices, they’re running around four dollars and 62 cents a pound. That needs to be up more like eight, nine, ten dollars a pound before they start making any money. Corn prices are awful, they’re terrible, and yet we still have hopes that we can get some corn planted down here. Problem is, we’re already getting late on planting and corn really, for the best production, needs water.”

Some producers may not survive another bad year if water shortages continue. When asked whether that could force land sales, Norman said options are limited.

“Well, or whoever wants to buy it or whatever you can do to do that,” Norman said. “There are very slim possibility of finding water that somebody else wants to sell, the water rights, but that’s minimal. You’re not going to find that much, number one, because people don’t have the water to sell.”

While desalination is often discussed as a long-term solution, Norman said it offers no immediate help.

“Not in the near future, no,” Norman said. “Who knows how long, 10, 20 years, it might be something that could be a viable water supply. I think probably more for cities than for irrigation purposes.”

He also noted that delayed deliveries from Mexico are not a new issue for South Texas growers.

“They’ve been through us more than once, but they certainly are apprehensive, and the planted acres of crops down here, particularly cotton, are going to be a very low prospect for this year,” Norman said.

As for what lies ahead, Norman offered a blunt assessment.

“Oh, just hang on to your hats,” he said. “It’s going to be a fun year.”

Congressional Reaction

U.S. Representative Henry Cuellar (D-TX) said Mexico’s renewed commitment represents progress but emphasized that significant work remains. Cuellar issued the following statement to RFD NEWS:

“Mexico’s commitment to resume annual water deliveries under the 1944 Water Treaty is a critical step forward and reflects constructive, sustained engagement with our Mexican counterparts. I can confirm that the rate of water deliveries has increased. Significant debt remains outstanding, and I’m continuing to work with federal and Mexican officials to ensure it’s fully addressed. That clarity matters for farmers, ranchers, and communities like ours that depend on reliable water from the Rio Grande. I’ll continue pressing for full compliance and sustained follow-through so South Texans get the certainty and results they deserve.”
U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar (TX-28)

U.S. Representative Monica De La Cruz (R-TX) also issued a statement addressing the water agreement and its impact on South Texas communities:

“After years of non-compliance from the Mexican government on 1944 Water Treaty obligations, we have delivered accountability and secured historic water deliveries. I have led the charge for South Texans, working alongside President Trump and Secretary Rollins to demand the certainty our farmers need. Today’s announcement, which secures a minimum of 350,000 acre-feet of water annually and consistent, bilateral meetings, is a step in the right direction. Alongside this Administration, I will fight to ensure every drop of our water is secured.”
U.S. Rep. Monica De La Cruz (TX-15)

For now, though, many South Texas farmers say they are still waiting to see water flowing into irrigation systems — not just promises on paper.

Frank McCaffrey reporting for RFD NEWS.

Related Stories
While artificial intelligence, or AI, is reshaping both jobs and messaging in agriculture, CoBank data suggests human expertise still matters.
Bubba and Amy Miller run Miller Cattle Company in Eros, Louisiana. After visiting other homesteading fairs, they decided to put on their own.
The new AFBF Women in Agriculture survey is accepting responses from women in the industry across the United States now through March 31.
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (UNL) representative Dr. Dirac Twidwell joins us with the latest on woody encroachment conservation efforts in the Great Plains.
API said it stands ready to work with Congress to develop a balanced approach to E15 legislation that promotes fuel choice, supports investment certainty, and contributes to a stable and fair marketplace for American consumers.
Lawmakers are pressing for answers on how Washington’s “managed trade” approach — keeping leverage through long-term tariffs — will affect farmers, global markets, and future export opportunities.
In the meantime, Senate Majority Leader John Thune is asking that farmers be allowed to use marketing assistance loans to help stay afloat.
Beef industry groups seem to agree — market-based pricing, not federal intervention, best supports rancher livelihoods and long-term beef supply stability.
Cattle groups say additional imports would offer little relief for consumers but could erode rancher confidence as the industry begins to rebuild herds.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

The U.S. Meat Export Federation plans to expand its global market presence in the New Year and says it is focusing its appeal on the growing middle class worldwide.
USDA data indicates that 13.7 percent of U.S. households experienced food insecurity in 2024, the highest rate since 2014, even as most households remained food secure.
A look at the legislative year ahead as lawmakers return to Washington with a slate of trade concerns to tackle in 2026—from new Chinese tariffs on beef imports to the USMCA review this summer.
Rep. Randy Feenstra, R-IA, details how the “One, Big, Beautiful Bill” Act (OBBBA) supports farmers, biofuels, and rural communities with tax breaks, crop insurance relief, and ag infrastructure.
Jake Charleston of Specialty Risk Insurance shares risk-reduction strategies to help cattle producers prepare for a successful year ahead.
Oregon FFA CEO Kjer Kizer discusses the proposed budget reductions, potential consequences, and the importance of protecting learning opportunities for students interested in agriculture.