New Maps Highlight Uneven Farm Program Payment Patterns

The new county maps show farm program payments are widespread, but payment design still produces very different outcomes across regions and crops. AgriSompo’s Brooks York joins us to discuss the role of crop insurance in supporting mental health.

business corporate transparency act boi reporting generic_Photo by Mariakray via AdobeStock_322909427.png

Photo by Mariakray via Adobe Stock

Adobe Stock

URBANA, Il. (RFD NEWS)New county-level maps from the University of Illinois show Farm Bill Title I payments reached most of rural America from 2014 through 2023, but the largest totals were concentrated in a relatively small number of counties. The updated Policy Design Lab found 97 percent of counties received some payments, yet only 24 counties topped $100 million, and 197 exceeded $50 million.

The regional pattern is clear, but the comparison is not simple. The report says 18 of the top 25 counties for total ARC and PLC payments were in the South, while the counties with the most base acres were concentrated in places such as Montana, North Dakota, and Washington.

Farm-Level Takeaway: The new county maps show farm program payments are widespread, but payment design still produces very different outcomes across regions and crops.
Tony St. James, RFD News Markets Specialist

That matters because total payments alone do not explain the policy picture. Southern counties showed higher payments per base acre, but those areas also include crops such as cotton that carry much higher production costs than corn or soybeans, especially relative to average crop prices. The more important policy question is how program design interacts with crop mix, base acres, and payment triggers.

The report says PLC and ARC-CO produced notably different outcomes. Twenty-one of the top 25 PLC counties were in the South, while 23 of the top 25 ARC-CO counties were in the Midwest, and PLC generally produced higher payments per base acre.

The updated maps do not settle the fairness debate, but they do sharpen it. They show that payment outcomes remain highly uneven across regions, crops, and program structures as Congress continues to revisit farm policy.

READ MORE: https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/

Farmers are navigating market volatility as spring planting progresses, with mixed weather patterns and shifting input prices adding pressure that can take a toll on producers’ mental health during the season.

Brooks York with AgriSompo joined us on Monday’s Market Day Report in recognition of Mental Health Awareness Month to discuss the connection between risk management and farmer well-being.

In his interview with RFD News, York discussed how mental health is an often-overlooked aspect of crop insurance, emphasizing the importance of addressing the topic as producers face ongoing uncertainty in markets and weather. He also explained how the benefits of crop insurance can extend beyond farmers, supporting families, employees, and rural communities connected to agricultural operations.

In addition, York highlighted ongoing efforts to raise awareness around mental health in agriculture and noted there are organizations available for those looking to support the cause.

Related Stories
Reducing mental stress and focusing on controllable actions can improve decision-making in high-pressure environments, according to Hollywood actor and former Calif Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Tight fed supplies shift margin risk to packers, strengthening cattle price leverage but increasing volatility.
Expanding chicken supplies are likely to keep prices under pressure in early 2026 despite steady demand growth.
Prompt removal of Christmas trees and careful handling of decorations reduce winter fire risk during an already high-demand season for emergency services.
Reduced winter placements indicate tighter fed cattle supplies and greater leverage during peak-demand months.
AFBF Economist Faith Parum provides analysis and perspective on the Farmer Bridge Assistance Program—what commodity growers should know and potential remedies for producers facing crop losses where that aid falls short.

Related Stories
Federal nutrition policy is signaling a stronger demand for whole foods produced by U.S. farmers and ranchers. Consumer-facing guidance favors animal protein, but institutional demand may change little under existing saturated fat limits.
Farmer Bridge payments are being used primarily to reduce debt and protect cash flow, not drive new spending. Curt Blades with the Association of Equipment Manufacturers joined us to provide insight into the ag equipment market and the factors influencing sales.
Rail strength is helping stabilize grain movement, but river and export slowdowns continue to limit overall logistics momentum.
Retail pricing confirms tight cattle supplies and supports continued leverage for producers, reinforcing the need for disciplined risk management.
University of Nebraska President Dr. Jeffrey Gold joined us to share insights on building healthy habits and improving rural health in the year ahead.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Year-round E15 remains on the table, but procedural caution and competing regional interests pushed action into a slower, negotiated path.
A mid-January winter storm delivered snow, ice, and extreme cold to a broad swath of the U.S., disrupting transportation, stressing livestock systems, and adding cost and complexity to winter farm operations as producers look toward spring.
Heavier weights and strong late-year slaughter supported December production, but lower annual totals highlight ongoing supply tightness heading into 2026.
Strong production and rising stocks may pressure ethanol margins unless demand or exports continue to improve.
Rising import pressure and tougher export competition are likely to persist into 2026, supporting domestic supplies while capping export growth.
Without additional support, many soybean operations will continue to face financial stress as they prepare for the 2026 crop.