Oh, SNAP: Social services retake center stage in Washington

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) was once again on the national stage, front and center this week before the House Agriculture Committee.

While all eyes seem to be on the second report released under the Department of Health and Human Services’ “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) program, lawmakers in Washington are now debating some specific entitlement programs and social services on the committee level. Which means, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) was once again on the national stage, front and center this week before the House Agriculture Committee.

One group in the ag sector that got a shout-out in the MAHA report was dairy producers. The Commission is calling for a stop to “reduced fat” milk requirements in federal programs, allowing for greater consumer choice.

Dairy industry leaders like the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) support the move and are now calling on the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to expand dairy incentives in the SNAP program.

However, that presents a challenge, considering the recently passed “Big, Beautiful Bill” imposes additional administrative costs of the SNAP program onto the States, prompting some state leaders to explore artificial intelligence as a way to offset these expenses.

But Chloe Green with the American Public Human Services Association says she and other administrators have been asking for this kind of support for years.

“So that really they can be making sure they’re spending the most time on the cases that need it the most and streamlining cases that are more straightforward, simple,” Green said. “There has been some, although limited, guidance from USDA FNS around the use of automation, citing them as major changes required, which should, in practice, mean that a state can submit a request and then it will be acknowledged and therefore approved by FNS. Although we’ve heard from several of our members that there have been a lot of delays in response from USDA, or a lot of questions that have delayed the implementation, to be able to use automation.”

Some states have a long history of making erroneous payments to SNAP recipients, and digital theft has been a big issue. They cite Connecticut, where $6 million was skimmed over two years at sale locations. To help, some House Ag committee members are asking that SNAP cards include “chips,” like most debit and credit card companies have used for years.

Related Stories
Smith says the measure would expand fuel choices for consumers while advancing energy independence.
Growers should work with local agronomists, check state registrations, and follow all restricted-use label requirements.
Alan Bjerga with the National Milk Producers Federation shares how teens are helping fuel stronger demand for traditional U.S. dairy products.
Did the Kansas Court of Appeals Go Too Far in Clark v. McKee?

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

The new county maps show farm program payments are widespread, but payment design still produces very different outcomes across regions and crops. AgriSompo’s Brooks York joins us to discuss the role of crop insurance in supporting mental health.
Nebraska cattle rancher Joe Van Newkirk joins us to discuss wildfire recovery in Nebraska’s Sandhills athe challenges ranchers face restoring basic infrastructure after the fire.
Seasonal pricing strength is lining up with crop stress, giving wheat producers another weather-driven marketing window. Shaun Haney joins us to discuss concerns from ag bankers on farm profitability.
Dr. Ernie Goss joined us to break down the latest Rural Main Street Index, discuss pressures on farm finances and equipment sales, and share expectations for the ag economy ahead.
In an exclusive interview with RFD News correspondent Frank McCaffrey, Congressman Henry Cuellar (D-TX) expresses frustration with delays and increasing political divisions surrounding the bill.
New farm payment rules allow LLC members to have separate limits, but some local FSA offices are still applying outdated policies, creating confusion for producers.