Rural Money: New Payment Rules Leave Farmers Facing Confusion at Local FSA Offices

New farm payment rules allow LLC members to have separate limits, but some local FSA offices are still applying outdated policies, creating confusion for producers.

Shelly_Muzzall_01_21_19_USA_WA_Three_Sisters_Farm_018.jpg

3 Sisters Family Farm (FarmHER S4, Ep. 9)

FarmHer, Inc.

TOPEKA, Kan. (RFD NEWS) — A major policy change affecting farm program payments is causing confusion at the local level, as some producers report being held to outdated rules despite new federal guidance.

Under the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act (OBBBA), Congress revised how payment limits apply to pass-through entities, such as LLCs and S corporations. The update allows individual members of those entities to qualify for separate payment limits, rather than being capped at a single limit per entity.

The change was intended to eliminate what industry experts have long called the “person trap,” which previously pushed some operations into more complex business structures to maximize eligibility.

However, implementation has been uneven.

According to agricultural tax and law specialist Roger McEowen and his colleague Paul Neiffer, many local Farm Service Agency offices are still applying the previous “one-entity, one-limit” standard.

That disconnect appears to stem from a lag in training and guidance at the county level. Local offices are now required to verify that each individual within an LLC or S corporation meets the “Actively Engaged in Farming” standard — meaning they must provide proportional labor, management, or capital.

That added verification has created administrative challenges, with some offices defaulting to older interpretations until further direction is provided by state or national leadership.

Producers who are told the rule has not changed may need to take additional steps. Experts recommend consulting the updated FSA Handbook and requesting that local determinations be reviewed or escalated to the state office.

Clear documentation is also critical. Farmers seeking separate payment limits should be prepared to show detailed records of each member’s contributions to the operation.

While the policy shift is widely viewed as a positive for many farm businesses, the rollout highlights a familiar challenge in agriculture policy — changes in Washington do not always translate immediately on the ground.

READ MORE: FSA Entity Confusion — Firm to Farm

Related Stories
Smaller supplies could support cotton prices despite weak demand.
Federal aid helps, but producers will bear most of the losses. Balance sheets may look stable, but margins remain fragile without policy support.
RFD NEWS Markets Specialist Tony St. James reviews the USDA’s Farms and Land in Farms 2025 Summary.
Biofuel and corn producers await proposal as Renewable Fuels Association pushes for expanded ethanol access.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

UC Davis Professor and Extension Specialist Dr. Frank Mitloehner joined us on Friday’s Market Day Report to preview the festivities and share why this event has become such a special tradition for the ag community.
Beal joined us on Friday’s Market Day Report to discuss her election to NASDA’s presidency, challenges facing American agriculture, and her background as a Mainer and dairy farmer.
RFD-TV Farm Legal and Taxation expert Roger McEowen joined us Friday to break down the executive order and what it means for farmers and ranchers.
Chad Rezniek with the Colorado AgrAbility Project joined us as part of National Farm Safety and Health Week to discuss the growing need for behavioral health support in rural communities.
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer joined us on Friday’s Market Day Report to break down what this extension means for affected ranchers.
Potash has seen the most significant decline, falling 11 percent over the same five-year period.