Study: Crop Insurance Greatly Reduces Revenue Risk

Crop insurance remains a vital tool for managing climate-driven risk.

agricultural land affected by flooding crop insurance_Photo By Andrii Yalanskyi via Adobe Stock.jpg

Photo By Andrii Yalanskyi via Adobe Stock

LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD-TV)New research from North Dakota State University highlights the role of crop insurance in shielding farmers from revenue losses between 2015 and 2023.

Led by Senior Research Economist Francis Tsiboe, the study found that combining basic insurance products, such as Revenue Protection (RP) and Yield Protection (YP), with supplemental policies, including the Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO) and Enhanced Coverage Option (ECO), significantly boosted revenue stability.

Farmers using these combined programs had a 27.9 percent higher chance of recovering losses compared to those farming without insurance. Revenue variability dropped by nearly half, while downside risk fell by more than 80 percent.

Cotton saw the highest reduction in downside revenue risk at 88 percent, followed by corn, canola, and wheat. Geographically, states like Arizona, Iowa, and Illinois reported the strongest protections, while regions such as Arkansas and California saw more modest benefits.

The study also noted that the strongest protections often came with higher producer costs, though recent legislation in the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) increased premium subsidies for SCO and ECO to 80 percent, easing the out-of-pocket burden for farmers.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Crop insurance remains a vital tool for managing climate-driven risk. Supplemental policies can significantly reduce revenue volatility, with expanded subsidies making them more accessible and affordable for producers nationwide.

Related Stories
The new AFBF Women in Agriculture survey is accepting responses from women in the industry across the United States now through March 31.
Australia’s expanding harvest and global oversupply are keeping wheat and barley prices capped, though canola markets may hold firmer on shifting oilseed demand.
U.S. producers are holding off on equipment investments amid financial pressure, market uncertainty, a rising demand for diesel, and growing desperation for trade wins.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

As we continue our Countdown to Convention sponsored by Culver’s, we see how FFA helps students and alums like Kat Walker build skills for life through ag education.
American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) economist Bernt Nelson provides an updated outlook on the current U.S. cattle market.
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer discusses the status of USDA disaster aid, including delays to Stage 2 of the SDRP program, and what farmers should watch for as lawmakers negotiate an end to the government shutdown.
Taryn Fischels, Product Marketing Manager for Precision Upgrades at John Deere, joins us to share a sneak peek of her chat with FarmHER’s Kirbe Schnoor on the Dirt Diaries podcast.
Sen. Roger Marshall explains which types of beef are imported into the United States, how there’s room for new imports, and logical reasons for current high prices.
Record Australian exports and rising U.S. imports reflect continued tight domestic cattle supplies — a reminder that herd recovery remains key to balancing future beef prices.