Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern Refile $85B Rail Merger Application

Higher freight rates and potential service disruptions are key concerns for agriculture, which relies heavily on rail to move commodities.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD NEWS) — An $85 billion rail merger is back in front of federal regulators, as Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern refile their application to create the first coast-to-coast freight rail network in the United States.

The companies say the proposed deal could deliver major efficiencies across the supply chain, estimating savings of $3.5 billion annually for shippers. They also project the merger could remove more than two million trucks from U.S. roads and create roughly 1,200 union jobs.

However, opposition is mounting. Farm groups, shippers, and some state leaders warn the consolidation could reduce competition, leading to higher freight rates and potential service disruptions—key concerns for agriculture, which relies heavily on rail to move commodities.

The renewed filing follows an earlier setback from the Surface Transportation Board, which rejected the initial application due to insufficient detail.

Mike Steenhoek with the Soy Transportation Coalition explained the situation:

“What happened is that Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern had to submit a formal application to what’s called the U.S. Surface Transportation Board. That’s the government agency that has jurisdiction over approving or rejecting any kind of railroad merger or acquisition. And what the Surface Transportation Board determined was that the application was incomplete, and so they rejected the application. They really needed much more information than was provided within the application. They really need to understand, in order to make a proper ruling on this, they have to understand what’s going to be the impact on the public interest. What’s going to be the non-competition market power if this merger is allowed to move forward.”

The Surface Transportation Board is now reviewing the revised proposal, with public comments due by May 8.

RFD News will continue to follow developments as regulators weigh the potential impact on agriculture and the broader transportation system.

Related Stories
U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins said permanent access to the higher ethanol blend would provide farmers with much-needed certainty while supporting domestic crop demand.
Larger grain stocks increase supply pressure, but strong fall disappearance — especially for corn and sorghum — suggests demand remains an important offset.
Structural efficiency supports cattle prices and resilience — breaking it risks higher costs and greater volatility.
Strong pork demand and improving beef exports outside China support protein markets despite ongoing trade barriers.
Market reaction was bearish for corn and soybeans, with analysts noting that abundant supplies amid tepid demand could keep price pressure on agricultural commodities.
Logistics capacity remains available, but winter volatility favors flexible delivery and marketing plans. NGFA President Mike Seyfert provides insight into grain transportation trends, trade policy, and priorities for the year ahead.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

The U.S. Meat Export Federation plans to expand its global market presence in the New Year and says it is focusing its appeal on the growing middle class worldwide.
New World Screwworm cases in Mexico, including one within 200 miles of the U.S. border, are adding pressure to livestock markets and trade decisions.
Dr. Seth Meyer Concludes Service; Dr. Justin Benavidez Appointed USDA Chief Economist
USDA data indicates that 13.7 percent of U.S. households experienced food insecurity in 2024, the highest rate since 2014, even as most households remained food secure.
Weather, Tight Supplies, and Planning Shape Farm Decisions
Cotton demand depends on demonstrating performance and reliability buyers can rely on, not messaging alone.