U.S. Cattlemen Praise USDA Expansion of ‘Product of USA’ Label Awareness Campaign

Justin Tupper with the U.S. Cattlemen’s Association joins us to discuss the USDA’s voluntary labeling updates, industry priorities, and the outlook for U.S. cattle producers.

hamburger usa flag_mcool made in usa beef labeling_Photo By weyo via AdobeStock_210271842.jpg

Photo by weyo via Adobe Stock

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD NEWS) — The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is promoting a stricter “Product of USA” label standard to improve transparency and strengthen demand for domestically produced meat, poultry, and eggs.

The voluntary labeling rule, which took effect January 1, 2026, requires that animals be born, raised, harvested, and processed in the United States to qualify. The announcement, made by Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins on National Agriculture Day, is accompanied by a national awareness campaign to increase understanding among producers and consumers.

“This new label is about enhancing competitiveness for our producers, our great American producers, by leveling the playing field and increasing transparency through truthful labeling, because what our ranchers raise in this country is the very best in the entire world,” Rollins said. “It is why, as we’re opening up these markets in the U.K., Australia, and others, more countries want our beef.”

Rollins says the updated labeling rule will help level the playing field for U.S. producers while improving transparency and potentially expanding access to international markets.

The updated standard replaces prior guidance that allowed imported products to carry the label after minimal processing. USDA says the change is designed to align labeling with consumer expectations and ensure that producers investing in fully domestic supply chains can compete more fairly.

The move comes as the U.S. livestock sector faces structural challenges. USDA notes the loss of more than 100,000 farms since 2017, alongside a cattle herd at a 75-year low, even as beef demand has grown over the past decade.

The labeling effort is part of a broader USDA initiative to rebuild domestic capacity and improve market transparency across the supply chain.

Farm-Level Takeaway: New label rules may strengthen demand for U.S. products.
Tony St. James, RFD NEWS Markets Specialist

Industry leaders are weighing in with mixed reactions to updated “Product of USA” labeling rules, with major cattle groups — including the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) — largely applauding the move. Supporters say the change closes a longstanding loophole that allowed imported beef to carry a U.S. label, giving domestic producers a clearer advantage in the marketplace.

“We were glad to see that the Product of USA label requirements have come out now,” says NCBA’s Kent Bacus. “They’ve closed that loophole that allowed imported beef from carrying that designation. Now it’s an opportunity for U.S. producers, for U.S. processors to really promote that U.S. product. And so now with this new rule in place, if a retailer or a packer wants to use that designation, if a producer wants to market their beef as a ‘Product of USA,’ they have to be able to justify and verify that that is from an animal that was born, raised, harvested, and processed. And the key thing is that this is voluntary, so you can opt in. But it also means that the only thing that’s not allowed anymore is for packers and retailers to be able to use that designation to potentially market imported products as a ‘Product of USA.’”

Bacus says the label is less about food safety and more about marketing opportunities and consumer transparency.

“This is a marketing label,” he explains. “And the fact that, you know, now that the rules have been tightened, it creates some incentive to capture some of that demand. It’s not trying to make a one-size-fits-all approach for everybody, but it is saying, here are the rules. And if you’re going to pursue this, then it brings more integrity into the marketplace. I think, for consumers, this is an added bonus. For producers, it’s yet another way for us to market that product. You know, some folks may choose to market their product based on a state or regional claim, and the same rules apply. So that means that as we’re kind of tapping into that buy local approach and selling more direct to consumer, there can be some opportunities there.”

The rule comes as global demand for U.S. beef continues to grow. According to the U.S. Meat Export Federation, markets in Asia and the Western Hemisphere are trending higher, though China remains a volatile factor.

Cattle groups are largely applauding USDA’s campaign to promote the updated “Product of USA” label, aimed at helping consumers better identify beef that is truly produced in the United States.

Justin Tupper with the U.S. Cattlemen’s Association joined us on Friday’s Market Day Report to share his perspective.

In his interview with RFD News, Tupper discussed the importance of truthful origin labeling and how the updated standard helps better inform consumers at the point of purchase, and explained what the change means for U.S. cattle producers, noting the potential to strengthen demand for domestically raised beef.

Tupper also addressed whether additional labeling advancements may be needed in the future and shared insight into broader challenges facing the cattle industry, including factors producers are closely watching in the months ahead.

Related Stories
The new county maps show farm program payments are widespread, but payment design still produces very different outcomes across regions and crops. AgriSompo’s Brooks York joins us to discuss the role of crop insurance in supporting mental health.
Nebraska cattle rancher Joe Van Newkirk joins us to discuss wildfire recovery in Nebraska’s Sandhills athe challenges ranchers face restoring basic infrastructure after the fire.
Seasonal pricing strength is lining up with crop stress, giving wheat producers another weather-driven marketing window. Shaun Haney joins us to discuss concerns from ag bankers on farm profitability.
The spending bill keeps animal health and traceability funding in place while trimming several other USDA accounts.
The question of whether a traditional, multi-year Farm Bill is a constitutional necessity or merely an outdated artifact of legislative compromise — as opposed to a model of targeted reconciliation and ad hoc assistance — is one of the most critical debates in current agricultural policy.
New farm payment rules allow LLC members to have separate limits, but some local FSA offices are still applying outdated policies, creating confusion for producers.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Paul Neiffer joined us to explain how USDA’s base acre expansion will be calculated, outline key deadlines for farmers, and discuss how the changes tie into farm program decisions and the broader Farm Bill outlook.
Chad Fiechter joins us to discuss Purdue’s precision ag study, challenges in capturing value from technology, and what farmers should consider when investing in and adopting these tools.
Ethanol demand held together last week, but lower production and thinner stocks put more focus on export strength. Production capacity is also strengthening over time and benefiting soybean farmers.
Farm Bureau Economist Dr. Faith Parum discusses USDA’s efforts to expand fertilizer capacity, signals for farm profitability, and AFBF’s Farm Bill expectations.
Expanded export financing could provide greater support for ag sales abroad if buyers and lenders use the additional tools.
Kansas Congressman Derek Schmidt joins us to discuss House passage of the Farm Bill, its potential impact on farm profitability and stability, key policy compromises, and the outlook for Senate consideration.