A Handshake Deal and a $16.5 Million Tax Bill: Why the IRS May Not See Your Farm Loan the Way You Do

Farm legal expert Roger McEowen shares a recent court case illustrating how informal loans can create major tax issues for farms and ranches in the eyes of the IRS.

farming business contracts legal_stock photo_adobe stock.png

TOPEKA, Kan. (RFD NEWS) — Farmers and ranchers often move substantial amounts of money among family members and business entities. But without proper documentation, the IRS may characterize those transactions differently than intended.

Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law joined us on Tuesday’s Market Day report to discuss what farmers can learn from a recent U.S. Tax Court case involving an art dealer, which highlights the potential tax consequences of relying on informal agreements when money changes hands.

A Handshake Deal Could Turn a Farm Loan Into Taxable Income

Tax Court Rejects $16.5 Million Loan Claim

In his interview with RFD News, McEowen explains the case involved an art dealer who received $16.5 million from another dealer for an art transaction.

The transaction eventually fell apart. The taxpayer later claimed the money was either a loan or a customer deposit. However, no written agreement existed when the money changed hands.

The taxpayer attempted to create a promissory note about five months later, after the transaction had gone bad.

The Tax Court determined the $16.5 million was taxable income, not a loan.

“The lesson for farmers is pretty simple: Don’t rely on a handshake,” McEowen said. “I know we like to do a lot of handshake deals in ag, but when substantial amounts of money are involved, don’t do that.”

McEowen said farmers should document the nature of a transaction when the money changes hands, whether it is a loan, investment, capital contribution or deposit.

What Makes a Bona Fide Loan?

McEowen said the Tax Court looks at the substance of a transaction rather than simply what the parties call it.

In determining whether a transaction is a bona fide loan, the court considers seven factors, including whether there was:

  • A written note
  • An interest charge
  • A fixed repayment schedule
  • Collateral
  • Actual repayments
  • A reasonable prospect of repayment
  • Conduct by the parties showing they treated the transaction as a loan

“No single factor is decisive,” McEowen said. “But what they’re looking at is, when we take all those factors together, that’s going to tell the court whether there was a real obligation to repay when the money was originally transferred.”

Family Loans Need to Look Like Real Loans

Money transferred between family members can create additional questions, particularly when the parties do not charge interest.

McEowen said a family loan should be treated as an actual loan, including charging interest according to applicable IRS rules: “That means there’s going to be interest on that loan.”

The IRS publishes an applicable federal rate each month that can be used to establish an appropriate interest rate.

McEowen said families and friends may be tempted to set the interest rate very low, but doing so can create problems if the transaction does not look like a substantive loan.

Document the Transaction Before Transferring Money

McEowen said the first step is deciding what the transaction actually is before the money changes hands.

If it is a loan, he recommends preparing a formal loan agreement or promissory note identifying the lender and borrower, amount, interest rate, repayment schedule, and maturity date.

“Just like a bank would do,” McEowen said.

The parties also need to act like it is a loan by making payments, charging and paying the required interest, and keeping records.

If the transaction is an investment, capital contribution, or joint venture, McEowen said that relationship should also be documented.

“The bottom line here is, the tax character of the money is determined when the money changes hands,” he said. “Do all of this in advance, not when the IRS comes knocking.”

No Dollar Amount Guarantees Safety

McEowen said the need for documentation applies across the board, although the likelihood of an IRS audit can vary depending on the size of a transaction.

He noted that the $16.5 million transaction in the Tax Court case was substantial.

While a $10,000 transaction may be less likely to receive the same level of scrutiny, McEowen said farmers should still document the transaction properly.

MORE: When Money is Gross Income and Not a Loan - Firm to Farm

Related Stories
A Ninth Circuit ruling says federal sovereign immunity does not automatically bar ranchers from enforcing state-adjudicated water rights.
State wildlife officials cite population and health concerns in the temporary suspension.
Dr. Jeffrey Gold says AI can improve access to information but should not replace health care professionals.
Fred Nichols explains how crop residue can provide valuable nutrients and help protect soil, but farmers need to consider how to make those nutrients available for the next crop.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Paul Mitchell of Imogene Ingredients says a recent University of Nebraska feedlot trial found Farmatan improved cattle weight and feed efficiency and reduced liver abscesses versus controls.
President Donald Trump plans to sign an executive order to lower diesel costs, including expanding access to tax-exempt dyed diesel as farmers face high harvest fuel prices.
Ohio’s 90-day fuel-tax suspension provides temporary relief as farmers work through harvest, but Ohio Farm Bureau President Brad Bales says longer-term solutions are needed to address higher production costs.
Farm Aid Co-Executive Director Jen Fahy discusses the challenges facing family farmers, from rising costs and weather to land-use pressures.
USDA has added more than 30 million base acres to ARC and PLC and expanded crop insurance options and regenerative agriculture funding.
Creighton University’s Rural Mainstreet Index finds that higher input costs and tariffs are pressuring farm income, equipment sales, and the rural economy.