ACRE Act Begins Lowering Borrowing Costs for Producers

The ACRE Act modestly reduces farmland borrowing costs now, with more savings possible once federal guidance clarifies which loans qualify.

Waco Bend Ranch 1280x720.jpg

Williams Trew Real Estate - Allen Crumley

Photo via Williams Trew Real Estate’s website

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (RFD-TV) — A new tax exemption for farmland real estate loans is beginning to reduce borrowing costs for farmers, even as lenders await formal guidance on how to apply the law. The Access to Credit for our Rural Economy Act (PDF Version) — also known as ACRE, which is included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) — took effect immediately on July 4 and gives banks a 25 percent tax exemption on interest earned from newly originated farmland loans.

While far smaller than the 100-percent exemption proposed initially, it still helps producers facing squeezed margins from high input costs and softer grain markets.

The law is expected to be especially helpful for farmers seeking to purchase land they currently rent or expand existing acreage. Bankers say even a quarter-point rate reduction can meaningfully improve cash flow for beginning farmers. But most institutions are moving cautiously while waiting for Treasury and IRS guidance clarifying technical gray areas, including how to handle the partial exemption, whether certain refinancings qualify, and how chattel or equipment loans might be treated when bundled into real estate deals.

Despite its limitations, the ACRE Act improves commercial banks’ competitiveness against the Farm Credit System, which receives a full interest-income exemption.

ABA estimates the law could save producers roughly $100 per acre annually over the next 30 years — far more than recent one-time emergency payments. Bankers also view the legislation as a significant policy foothold that builds momentum for future expansions, especially if Congress revisits broader tax legislation in the coming years.

Farm-Level Takeaway: The ACRE Act modestly reduces farmland borrowing costs now, with more savings possible once federal guidance clarifies which loans qualify.
Tony St. James, RFD-TV Markets Specialist
Related Stories
Farmer Bridge Assistance payments provide immediate balance-sheet support heading into 2026, but remain a short-term bridge rather than a substitute for long-term market recovery.
The New Year is here, but in Oregon, some ranchers and livestock producers are still trying to recover from record wildfires back in 2024.
High ownership does not always translate into high output, underscoring the importance of structural differences in understanding state-level farm performance.
Benchmark machinery costs against those of similar-sized, high-performing operations to inform equipment and investment decisions.
A narrower Section 1071 rule could reduce regulatory pressure on ag lenders while keeping credit available in rural communities.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Lower U.S. and Mexican production means tighter sugar supplies and greater reliance on imports headed into 2026.
Tyson’s closure reflects deep supply shortages in the U.S. cattle industry, tightening packing capacity, weakening competition, and signaling more volatility ahead for cow-calf producers and feedyards.
Lower tariff rates and new rail-service proposals may improve corn movement efficiency during early-season marketing.
Crop producers face tightening credit and lower incomes, while strong cattle markets continue to stabilize finances in livestock-heavy regions.
Early Cattle-on-Feed estimates point to slightly tighter cattle supplies, reinforcing the need to monitor prices and timing for winter marketing.
Removing the 40% duty sharply lowers U.S. beef import costs on beef, coffee, fertilizer and fruit, and restores Brazil’s competitiveness during a period of tight domestic supply.