Ag Economy Barometer Shows Weaker Sentiment but Hope for Future

Prepare for tighter cash flow, delayed capital buys, and policy-driven risk management this fall.

CHICAGO, Ill. (RFD-TV) — As farmers brace for further delays in potential federal aid packages, many are already grappling with expectations of weaker financial performance this year. Tight margins are reshaping on-farm decisions heading into 2025. Purdue/CME’s September Ag Economy Barometer held at 126, but producers’ view of current conditions slipped as USDA projected record corn and soybean yields alongside weaker prices.

The most recent CME Ag Economy Barometer survey for September indicates that, despite mounting uncertainty, producer sentiment regarding the future remains cautiously optimistic. Farmer sentiment held steady in September as the Purdue University/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer rose one point to a reading of 126.

However, the Index of Current Conditions fell seven points to 122, while future expectations climbed five points to 128, reflecting hope that policy relief could offset price pressure. Farmers remain concerned about low crop prices and record-high yields, which are putting pressure on their margins. Optimism about the future is tied to expectations of potential government support.

The Farm Financial Performance Index slid to 88, and the Farm Capital Investment Index dropped to 53, signaling more caution on equipment and facility upgrades.

Short-term farmland value optimism weakened for a fourth consecutive month, with most expecting values to remain steady rather than increase. Support for tariffs is fading, and uncertainty is rising, even as many anticipate MFP-style assistance if trade frictions lead to price increases. Cover-crop adoption remains widespread, with users reporting that they are planting them on a larger share of acres than in 2021, underscoring a shift toward cost control and resilience.

CME Group Executive Director of Agricultural Research, Fred Seamon, joined us on Wednesday’s Market Day Report to unpack the latest survey findings.

In his interview with RFD-TV News, Seamon discussed how delayed relief and ongoing policy changes are influencing producers’ views of both current and future economic conditions. He highlighted the survey’s responses to questions about the direction of the ag economy, the anticipated impact of tariffs, and producer expectations for future compensation.

Seamon also shared insights on farmland value trends and provided his key takeaway from this month’s barometer, offering a closer look at how farmers are navigating a challenging financial landscape while maintaining cautious optimism about the road ahead.

Sentiment has swung throughout the year—rising in spring on stronger markets, then falling again in summer as costs and trade worries returned. The back-and-forth trend underscores how rapidly farm confidence responds to fluctuations in prices, weather, and policy changes.

Related Stories
Mississippi Farm Bureau hosted the annual event in support of hunger relief programs across the state.
New livestock pest research in Texas could strengthen tools protecting cattle health, movement, and ranch profitability.
Higher domestic ethanol blending supports corn demand even as weekly production and export volumes decline.
Specialty crop growers should confirm eligible acreage and application access early to avoid missing available assistance.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

USDA will elevate its “Plant Not Plastic” initiative and promote American cotton over synthetic fibers.
The investigation does not prove wrongdoing, but it raises federal scrutiny of a major cost center for crop producers.
The state-level focus is split between labeling and sales restrictions.
For decades, U.S. agriculture has planned around feeding a growing world. Experts say that trend could reverse course in the next 30 years.
The reports cover biodiesel, diesel, gasoline grades, ethanol, aviation fuel, kerosene, and specialty fuels.
Textile strategist Robert Antoshak says responsible fashion is not dead, but voluntary sustainability language is not enough on its own.