China Signals Doubt on Meeting U.S. Soybean Commitments

China’s cost advantage with Brazilian soybeans and vague public messaging leave U.S. export prospects uncertain heading into winter.

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (RFD-TV) — China’s soybean buying remains far weaker than Washington’s expectations, despite political assurances made after last month’s Trump–Xi meeting.

Retired USDA economist Dr. Fred Gale notes that China’s Ministry of Commerce refused this week to confirm the White House’s claim that Beijing would buy 12 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans before year-end and 25 million tons annually from 2026–28. Instead, the spokesman delivered a broad statement about “cooperative trade,” avoiding any mention of soybeans — a move mirrored across Chinese media outlets that repeated the non-answer without clarifying China’s intent.

Market behavior continues to contradict diplomatic language. China has imported nearly 96 mmt of soybeans so far in 2025, but only 16.8 mmt from the U.S., making the promised 12 mmt surge before year-end increasingly implausible.

Prices remain the most significant obstacle: U.S. soybeans still face a 13 percent tariff, compared with 3 percent for Brazilian beans, and delivered-to-port prices (the bean plus freight) show Brazilian soybeans running roughly $60–$70 per ton cheaper than U.S. shipments. That advantage is shaping buying patterns. COFCO made a few symbolic purchases around the Trump–Xi meeting, but China simultaneously signed a 20-mmt agreement with Brazil at the Shanghai Import Expo and has not deployed Sinograin — its reserve buyer — to procure U.S. supplies.

Record port stocks, weak crushing margins, and slow feed demand add to the drag. Analysts say China is unlikely to buy large volumes until margins improve — and even then, Brazil remains the cheaper, higher-priority origin.

Farm-Level Takeaway: China’s cost advantage with Brazilian soybeans and vague public messaging leave U.S. export prospects uncertain heading into winter.
Tony St. James, RFD-TV Markets Specialist
Related Stories
Lawmakers from Texas and Tennessee outline priorities for USMCA renegotiations, focusing on tariffs, China trade concerns, beef prices, and stability for U.S. agriculture.
Adequate transportation capacity exists, but fuel costs and soft river demand could widen basis risk.
Tight storage could widen basis and limit marketing flexibility.
Large carry-in stocks across major crops could limit price recovery in 2026/27 unless demand strengthens or weather-related supply reductions occur.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

“Cow goggles” are helping farmers experience cattle vision in real time, offering new tools to reduce stress, improve movement, and enhance livestock management.
Fewer interruptions could translate to improved efficiency—and fewer costly delays when timing matters most.
K-State’s Dr. Gregg Ibendahl breaks down the impacts of the Middle East ceasefire on energy markets and input costs, and what farmers should watch in the weeks ahead.
CME Group Executive Director of Ag Research Fred Seamon discusses the recent rise in farmer sentiment highlighted in the March Ag Economy Barometer report.
Faster approvals could speed projects, but may face scrutiny.
Coal-based ethanol could weaken long-term export demand for corn-based fuels.