Farm Contracts Explained: Why Timing Can Make or Break the Deal

RFD News Farm Legal Expert Roger McEowen shares the major role of timing clauses in farmland sales, leases, and succession planning.

farming business contracts legal_stock photo_adobe stock.png

TOPEKA, Kan. (RFD News) — Timing is a major factor throughout agriculture, where planting windows, markets, and seasonal pressures can all affect business decisions.

That is one reason legal agreements tied to agriculture often include the phrase “time is of the essence,” a clause designed to emphasize the importance of meeting contractual deadlines.

RFD News farm legal expert Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law joined us on Wednesday’s Market Day Report to discuss how the clause applies across the agriculture industry.

“Without a ‘time is of the essence’ clause, a lot of courts may permit reasonable delays or substantial compliance if the delay doesn’t materially prejudice the other party.”

He says adding the clause can significantly change how courts view contractual deadlines.

“If you add that clause, that’s going to substantially change the contract dramatically, and so when you’ve got that language in there, what that means is that deadlines now become material and they’re material in terms of they’re an obligation under the contract. Failure to perform on time may constitute a breach of the contract, a material breach.”

In his conversation with RFD News, McEowen explained how timing issues can affect land sale transactions and farm lease agreements, especially in an industry heavily tied to seasonal cycles. He also discussed crop inputs, grain marketing contracts, and the role that timing clauses can play in farm succession planning.

READ MORE: When “Time Is of the Essence” Really Matters in Agricultural Transactions

Related Stories
Higher input costs and tighter cash flow are keeping pressure on farm income, credit needs, and capital spending.
Congressman Mark Messmer discusses the Farm Bill, rural investment priorities, Prop 12, and support for farmers facing economic pressure.
Current estimates are already hovering around 80 weeks.
Chicago Fed lenders report producers are carrying more operating debt as repayment rates continue weakening across the Midwest.
Cattle markets continue supporting rural land values, but lenders say repayment rates and carryover debt are becoming a larger focus.
StoneX analyst Josh Linville says global supply risks and continued dependence on imported urea are keeping fertilizer markets on edge.

Knoxville native Neal Burnette-Irwin is a graduate from MTSU where he majored in Journalism and Entertainment Studies. He works as a digital content producer with RFD News and is represented by multiple talent agencies in Nashville and Chicago.


LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

From meatpacking settlements to landmark NEPA rulings, Roger McEowen outlines the top legal developments in 2025 that will shape agriculture in the years ahead.
Alan Bjerga with the National Milk Producers Federation joined us to review new policies and regulations supporting the dairy industry and what they mean for the year ahead.
Despite rising costs and growing food insecurity, meat demand remained strong in 2025 as higher-income consumers offset cutbacks elsewhere. Economists break down the K-shaped economy, upcoming USDA cattle reports, livestock production outlooks, and renewed debate over beef imports and country-of-origin labeling heading into 2026.
Corn growers are turning to ethanol, E15 expansion, and export markets to help absorb record supplies and stabilize prices. Farm leaders discuss low-carbon ethanol demand, flex-fuel vehicle challenges, input costs, and the role of USMCA as producers look for market relief in the year ahead.
From rising trade tensions in Europe to a pending Supreme Court decision on tariffs and shifting demand from China, global trade policy spearheaded by President Donald Trump continues to shape the outlook for U.S. agriculture—adding uncertainty as farmers navigate another volatile year.
The Surface Transportation Board rejects the proposed Norfolk Southern–Union Pacific merger, prompting concerns from agricultural shippers about rail consolidation, service reliability, and higher transportation costs.