Glyphosate Duties Dropped: Farmers Get Relief as Import Petition Is Withdrawn

Farm groups welcomed the withdrawal of a proposed glyphosate import duty, saying it helps keep input costs lower as new research and a Supreme Court ruling keep the herbicide in the spotlight.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD News) — Farmers received encouraging news on glyphosate this week after Monsanto subsidiary Ruveon withdrew its request for antidumping duties on glyphosate imports from China, a move farm groups say could help keep input costs from rising.

The petition had raised concerns across agriculture that additional import duties would increase the cost of one of the industry’s most widely used herbicides. After hearing those concerns from farmers and agricultural organizations, Ruveon announced it would withdraw the request and maintain its current pricing approach.

The National Corn Growers Association and the American Soybean Association welcomed the decision, calling it a positive step toward keeping production costs in check during a challenging farm economy.

Illinois Study Examines Cost of Losing Glyphosate

The latest development comes as researchers continue examining what agriculture could look like without glyphosate.

A new analysis from the University of Illinois estimates that corn and soybean growers in the state could lose more than $600 million annually if glyphosate were permanently unavailable. Researchers estimate that would amount to a revenue loss of more than 3.5 percent each year, reflecting higher weed-control costs and potential reductions in crop productivity.

Glyphosate has remained one of the most widely used herbicides in U.S. agriculture, though its use has faced years of legal and regulatory scrutiny.

Supreme Court Ruling Adds Legal Clarity

The issue also received renewed attention last month when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal pesticide laws preempt certain state-level “failure-to-warn” claims against pesticide manufacturers. The decision limits states’ ability to require labeling or warnings that differ from federal standards under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).

The ruling is expected to have significant implications for ongoing pesticide litigation while providing additional legal certainty for products approved through the federal registration process.

Related Stories
Kubota Tractor Corporation President Alex Woods credits customer trust and a strong dealer network for the milestone.
Weak tractor and combine sales show producers remain cautious about committing capital to major equipment purchases.
The tool tracks prices, supplies and transportation costs affecting farmers.
Farm Bureau says fresh fruit and vegetable imports have surged 70% since 2010, creating new competition for U.S. growers during harvest seasons.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

USDA funding will support work at 14 generation sites and improve reliability for farmers.
Rural cancer patients often face significant barriers to receiving specialized care, with many forced to travel long distances for treatment.
The initiative can also introduce U.S. wheat to new potential customers, creating relationships that may continue even after food aid programs end.
Fordyce said the meetings give producers an opportunity to communicate directly with USDA officials about issues affecting their operations.
Kansas, North Dakota, and Nebraska are states where H-2A wage rates are increasing by roughly 20 percent in some cases.
Heather Ramsey says farmers cannot control how outside market participants react to government reports, but they can control their own marketing strategies.