House Ag Committee approves $300 billion in cuts to nutrition spending

House Ag.jpg

Photo via Official Twitter

The House Ag Committee spent all day and night voting on President Trump’s tax cut bill, also known as the “One Big, Beautiful Bill,” specifically marking up language tied to SNAP and farm security.

Tonight, they voted 29-25 to advance legislation that cuts $300 billion in food aid spending, according to Politico.

The vote now goes to the House Budget Committee before a full floor vote.

Chair GT Thompson explained the GOP strategy.
“More specifically, our reconciliation instructions provide the opportunity to restore integrity to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP, to make sure that this essential program works for the most vulnerable and functions as Congress as it is intended. Additionally, it allows for vital investment with our Farm Bill programs addressing immediate needs for farmers, ranchers, and rural communities. By putting the farm back in the Farm Bill, Congress will be better able to deliver a full, long-term reauthorization of a highly effective Farm Bill.

Story via Grace Yarrow with Politico

Related Stories
Nutrition policy shifts may influence retail demand across agriculture.
The debate now matters as much as the policy — market rules and regulatory clarity depend on whether Congress can finish the bill this year.
Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law reviews key highlights from the House Agriculture Committee’s latest farm bill proposal.
President Donald Trump speaks at the World Economic Forum in Davos, addressing SNAP spending, tariff threats against Europe, market reactions, and the upcoming USMCA review.
House Agriculture Committee Democrats are calling for action on the Farm and Family Relief Act, warning that proposed SNAP cost shifts to states could reduce food assistance for low-income families amid ongoing tariffs and trade disruptions that continue to strain U.S. farmers.
Federal nutrition policy is signaling a stronger demand for whole foods produced by U.S. farmers and ranchers. Consumer-facing guidance favors animal protein, but institutional demand may change little under existing saturated fat limits.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Alan Bjerga with the National Milk Producers Federation joined us to review new policies and regulations supporting the dairy industry and what they mean for the year ahead.
Despite rising costs and growing food insecurity, meat demand remained strong in 2025 as higher-income consumers offset cutbacks elsewhere. Economists break down the K-shaped economy, upcoming USDA cattle reports, livestock production outlooks, and renewed debate over beef imports and country-of-origin labeling heading into 2026.
Corn growers are turning to ethanol, E15 expansion, and export markets to help absorb record supplies and stabilize prices. Farm leaders discuss low-carbon ethanol demand, flex-fuel vehicle challenges, input costs, and the role of USMCA as producers look for market relief in the year ahead.
From rising trade tensions in Europe to a pending Supreme Court decision on tariffs and shifting demand from China, global trade policy spearheaded by President Donald Trump continues to shape the outlook for U.S. agriculture—adding uncertainty as farmers navigate another volatile year.
The Surface Transportation Board rejects the proposed Norfolk Southern–Union Pacific merger, prompting concerns from agricultural shippers about rail consolidation, service reliability, and higher transportation costs.
Midland County Livestock Association President Brandon Mitchell reflects on another strong year for the event, including a premium sale that once again topped the million-dollar mark.