Mexico Agrees to Water Payments Under 1944 Treaty, but South Texas Farmers Still Waiting on Relief

South Texas farmers say water shortages continue despite Mexico’s renewed payments under the 1944 Water Treaty.

LOREDO, TEXAS (RFD NEWS) — Last week, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins announced that the United States and Mexico reached a new agreement regarding water deliveries under the 1944 U.S.-Mexico Water Treaty.

“We have struck another deal with the country of Mexico with regard to the 1944 U.S., Mexico Water Treaty,” Rollins said. “Not surprisingly, the United States has consistently met its water obligation under that treaty. But for the past six years, and I was saying even before — when I worked for another Governor, Governor Rick Perry 25 years ago — we were negotiating with Mexico on this issue because they failed to — again — meet their obligations.”

Under the agreement, Mexico is expected to deliver 202,000 acre-feet of water before March, with additional payments planned.

But while the deal marks progress on paper, many in the South Texas agricultural community say relief has yet to materialize.

“There still are issues trying to get the water here,” said John Norman, a South Texas agriculture consultant. “As to my understanding, the water district still have not made allotments to the growers because they still don’t have enough water to get that in there where they can count on the water being there when they need it. So yes, the water supply is one of the biggest issues that we are dealing with down here.”

Without dependable irrigation water, farmers are facing mounting financial strain.

“Cotton prices, for instance, have gone down to 62 cents a pound right at this point in time,” Norman said. “If we had it to sell, which we don’t, we will have in July. But the thing is, that’s about 20 to 25 cents a pound too short for growers to make any money. Same thing on grain sorghum prices, they’re running around four dollars and 62 cents a pound. That needs to be up more like eight, nine, ten dollars a pound before they start making any money. Corn prices are awful, they’re terrible, and yet we still have hopes that we can get some corn planted down here. Problem is, we’re already getting late on planting and corn really, for the best production, needs water.”

Some producers may not survive another bad year if water shortages continue. When asked whether that could force land sales, Norman said options are limited.

“Well, or whoever wants to buy it or whatever you can do to do that,” Norman said. “There are very slim possibility of finding water that somebody else wants to sell, the water rights, but that’s minimal. You’re not going to find that much, number one, because people don’t have the water to sell.”

While desalination is often discussed as a long-term solution, Norman said it offers no immediate help.

“Not in the near future, no,” Norman said. “Who knows how long, 10, 20 years, it might be something that could be a viable water supply. I think probably more for cities than for irrigation purposes.”

He also noted that delayed deliveries from Mexico are not a new issue for South Texas growers.

“They’ve been through us more than once, but they certainly are apprehensive, and the planted acres of crops down here, particularly cotton, are going to be a very low prospect for this year,” Norman said.

As for what lies ahead, Norman offered a blunt assessment.

“Oh, just hang on to your hats,” he said. “It’s going to be a fun year.”

Congressional Reaction

U.S. Representative Henry Cuellar (D-TX) said Mexico’s renewed commitment represents progress but emphasized that significant work remains. Cuellar issued the following statement to RFD NEWS:

“Mexico’s commitment to resume annual water deliveries under the 1944 Water Treaty is a critical step forward and reflects constructive, sustained engagement with our Mexican counterparts. I can confirm that the rate of water deliveries has increased. Significant debt remains outstanding, and I’m continuing to work with federal and Mexican officials to ensure it’s fully addressed. That clarity matters for farmers, ranchers, and communities like ours that depend on reliable water from the Rio Grande. I’ll continue pressing for full compliance and sustained follow-through so South Texans get the certainty and results they deserve.”
U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar (TX-28)

U.S. Representative Monica De La Cruz (R-TX) also issued a statement addressing the water agreement and its impact on South Texas communities:

“After years of non-compliance from the Mexican government on 1944 Water Treaty obligations, we have delivered accountability and secured historic water deliveries. I have led the charge for South Texans, working alongside President Trump and Secretary Rollins to demand the certainty our farmers need. Today’s announcement, which secures a minimum of 350,000 acre-feet of water annually and consistent, bilateral meetings, is a step in the right direction. Alongside this Administration, I will fight to ensure every drop of our water is secured.”
U.S. Rep. Monica De La Cruz (TX-15)

For now, though, many South Texas farmers say they are still waiting to see water flowing into irrigation systems — not just promises on paper.

Frank McCaffrey reporting for RFD NEWS.

Related Stories
Leadership development and bipartisan engagement remain central to advancing agriculture’s priorities in 2026.
How the Public Trust Doctrine Threatens Agricultural Property Rights
Reducing mental stress and focusing on controllable actions can improve decision-making in high-pressure environments, according to Hollywood actor and former Calif Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Prompt removal of Christmas trees and careful handling of decorations reduce winter fire risk during an already high-demand season for emergency services.
AFBF Economist Faith Parum provides analysis and perspective on the Farmer Bridge Assistance Program—what commodity growers should know and potential remedies for producers facing crop losses where that aid falls short.
Federal nutrition policy is signaling a stronger demand for whole foods produced by U.S. farmers and ranchers. Consumer-facing guidance favors animal protein, but institutional demand may change little under existing saturated fat limits.
Trade uncertainty—especially regarding soybeans—continues to weigh on future outlooks, even as farm finances and land values remain resilient.
Strong export demand supports feed grain prices, but drought risk and seasonal patterns favor disciplined early-year marketing.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Global pork production is expected to rise in the first half of 2026, despite trade volatility stemming from shifting import policies and swine disease pressures.
Tennessee State Veterinarian Dr. Samantha Batey joined us with the latest on biosecurity efforts and the state’s new “Know Before You Show” initiative.
Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller discusses the state’s latest efforts to prevent the New World screwworm from reaching Texas.
Economists are also closely watching how policy decisions in Washington could influence markets moving forward. Analysts say deferred futures for corn, soybeans, and wheat suggest markets are operating near break-even levels, not at prices that would encourage expanded production.
House Agriculture Committee Chairman “GT” Thompson is pushing a “Farm Bill 2.0.”
University of Nebraska President Dr. Jeffrey Gold joined us with important insights on drug safety and rural health during the winter months.