New Maritime Fees Deepen U.S.-China Trade Tensions

New U.S. fees on Chinese-owned and built ships took effect overnight, marking the latest escalation in maritime trade tensions between Washington and Beijing.

WASHINGTON (RFD-TV) — New fees are now in effect for Chinese-owned and built ships here in the U.S. The mandate took effect overnight. The Trump Administration officials say it is all to balance the scales, but some farmers worry it could mean less money in their pockets if shipping companies begin passing along those new fees.

The fee is $46 per net ton and applies to up to five trips a year, with payments made online through the treasury. China quickly hit back, saying it will charge similar fees on American ships starting at 400 CN¥ (Yuan) per ton and rising over the next few years.

Last night, China said that the fee will not apply to U.S. ships made in China. Officials on both sides say the costs are part of ongoing trade disputes over shipping and maritime rules.

And while the markets are looking to stabilize after a tough stretch in grains and oilseeds, Allendale’s chief strategist, Rich Nelson, says traders are still watching for signs of a rebound in soybeans, as tensions with China continue.

“We do expect some type of brief meeting between Trump and the Chinese president on October 31,” Nelson said. “The question we’re all watching is, will this result in any soybean buying, and if so, how much? So, without real confirmation of that type of story, we cannot suggest yet that soybeans need to rebound. And it still leaves the potential open, maybe for pricing under $10 even here. “

The current government shutdown means no major reports out of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Nelson says that it did not matter much for last week’s WASDE report, but says next month could be a much different story.

“The October supply demand report, which we just missed last week -- most people probably had a relatively good explanation for what USDA would have given us, so I don’t think that would be the big surprise for us,” Nelson said. “Keep in mind, the big concern is really as we go into November, that’s when yield declines are typically seen with a little more severity. So, a lot of us are waiting on our yield story to maybe give it some more support. That’s probably still lined up here in next month’s potential supply-demand report.”

And speaking of reports, some are still delayed, but others, like the Consumer Price Index (CPI) report, will still be released in the coming weeks. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is calling workers back to the office to disseminate that information. Right now, the BLS aims to have those numbers out on October 24.

Related Stories
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is investing now to make markets less volatile for ranchers over the long term and more affordable for consumers, according to a press release.
Elizabeth Strom with the American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers (ASFMRA) joined us to share the latest on harvest progress and market activity in her area.
Lyndsey Smith with RealAg Radio discusses how global trade dynamics could shape the future of Canada’s pulse exports.
“Farmers for Free Trade” warns that disaster is brewing as President Trump’s trade policy is causing farm input costs to rise even more.
NCBA CEO Colin Woodall says more conversations need to occur with stakeholders present surrounding President Trump’s proposal to lower consumer beef prices with Argentinian imports.
Corn and wheat inspections outpaced last year, but soybean movement remains seasonally active yet behind, keeping basis and freight dynamics in focus by corridor.
The new AFBF Women in Agriculture survey is accepting responses from women in the industry across the United States now through March 31.
Lawmakers are pressing for answers on how Washington’s “managed trade” approach — keeping leverage through long-term tariffs — will affect farmers, global markets, and future export opportunities.
Beef industry groups seem to agree — market-based pricing, not federal intervention, best supports rancher livelihoods and long-term beef supply stability.