Ocean Freight Rates Rise Above Last Year’s Levels

Higher ocean freight rates can add export cost pressure even when grain demand remains active.

Aerial of cargo ship carrying container for export cargo from cargo yard port to other ocean concept smart freight shipping ship front view_Photo by Yellow Boat via AdobeStock_1601867486.jpg

Aerial of a cargo ship carrying a container of exports.

Photo by Yellow Boat via Adobe Stock

NASHVILLE, TENN. (RFD NEWS) — Bulk ocean freight rates moved higher in early 2026 instead of following the usual softer first-quarter pattern. That matters for agriculture because higher vessel costs can raise export expenses for U.S. grain and affect trade competitiveness.

The report said first-quarter grain shipping rates topped year-ago levels on key routes. U.S. Gulf to Japan averaged $54.93 per metric ton, up 19 percent from a year earlier. Pacific Northwest to Japan averaged $30.68, up 14 percent. Gulf to Europe averaged $22.98, up 2 percent from a year ago.

Rates also strengthened as the quarter progressed. The report linked that move to stronger grain demand, firmer dry bulk cargo movement, and tighter vessel availability. South American shipments and stronger demand from Asia also supported the market.

Fuel costs added more pressure. Bunker fuel prices climbed sharply in March as the Middle East conflict disrupted shipping and energy markets. Higher voyage costs helped push freight rates upward.

By April 16, Gulf-to-Japan grain rates had reached $67.00 per metric ton, while Pacific Northwest to Japan reached $35.50. Analysts said fuel costs, vessel supply, and China’s demand will shape the market ahead.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Higher ocean freight rates can add export cost pressure even when grain demand remains active.
Tony St. James, RFD News Markets Specialist
Related Stories
“Farmers for Free Trade” warns that disaster is brewing as President Trump’s trade policy is causing farm input costs to rise even more.
Corn and wheat inspections outpaced last year, but soybean movement remains seasonally active yet behind, keeping basis and freight dynamics in focus by corridor.
Lawmakers are pressing for answers on how Washington’s “managed trade” approach — keeping leverage through long-term tariffs — will affect farmers, global markets, and future export opportunities.
In the meantime, Senate Majority Leader John Thune is asking that farmers be allowed to use marketing assistance loans to help stay afloat.
Beef industry groups seem to agree — market-based pricing, not federal intervention, best supports rancher livelihoods and long-term beef supply stability.
Lyndsey Smith with Real Ag Radio joined RFD-TV to share a Canadian perspective on the discussions.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Row crop losses in 2025 are outpacing last year. With no disaster aid yet approved, many operations face a tough financial bridge to 2026 even as Farm Bill improvements remain a year away.
Experts say farmers and ethanol producers would benefit from a risk-based ILUC system that protects forests without relying on speculative modeling.
Farmland values remain stable, but weakened credit conditions and lower expected farm income signal tighter financial margins heading into 2026.
Ethanol exports are expanding on strong demand from Canada and Europe, while DDGS shipments remain broad-based and supportive for feed markets.
Mary-Thomas Hart, with the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, discusses the latest WOTUS developments and their implications for agriculture.
Only properly documented, unexhausted fertilizer applied by prior owners may qualify for Section 180 expensing; broader nutrient-based claims carry significant legal and tax risk.