Proposed Norfolk Southern-Union Pacific Merger Goes Off the Rails

The Surface Transportation Board rejects the proposed Norfolk Southern–Union Pacific merger, prompting concerns from agricultural shippers about rail consolidation, service reliability, and higher transportation costs.

NASHVILLE, TENN. (RFD NEWS) — New details on the proposed rail merger between Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific. The Surface Transportation Board (STB) has rejected the initial application, citing missing key information.

The STB says the decision does not mean the merger is impossible. Both companies now have the opportunity to revise and resubmit their application. The initial paperwork was more than 6500 pages long. The STB says details on market share were missing, along with other contractual information.

Groups like the Soy Transportation Coalition (STC) have been watching the process since the merger was proposed. In a recent interview with RFD NEWS, STC Executive Director Mike Steenhoek says there are concerns across the ag spectrum about consolidation if that merger goes through.

“People point to the fact that this is not our first rodeo — we’ve had mergers, acquisitions, and consolidations within the rail industry for a number of decades,” Steenhoek explains. “What that does is it often results in higher rates, a decline in service, and, for agriculture and other industries, what you want is as many transportation providers competing for your business. That’s good for us, and when, all of a sudden, you start eliminating or reducing those transportation providers, you start changing that competitive balance away from the customer, agricultural shippers, in our case, or the railroad. So rightfully, there are a number of shippers who are very concerned about this.”

Leaders at Union Pacific say they have received more than 2,000 letters of support for the merger. STB says that while the application can be resubmitted, it will require another comprehensive review.

Related Stories
From “right to repair” to investigations into the “Big Four” meatpackers, antitrust issues were a major legal topic in 2025 and promise to have a long-term impact on the agriculture industry in the future.
Roger McEowen with the Washburn University School of Law joined us to provide legal analysis on key cases shaping the agricultural landscape heading into the year ahead.
RFD News correspondent Frank McCaffrey reports from Texas on the ongoing water dispute and its implications for U.S. farmers.
RealAg Radio host Shaun Haney discusses the latest developments in the Supreme Court, trade tariffs, and the future of the USMCA under President Donald Trump.
The American Farm Bureau Federation’s 2026 agenda centers on labor stability, biosecurity, and economic resilience for family farms. Expanded DMC coverage improves risk protection for dairy operations facing tighter margins.
A high-stakes legal case in a South Dakota federal court concerning misleading country-of-origin labeling (MCOOL), such as “Product of the USA,” on food products, will significantly impact U.S. agricultural policy for years to come.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

University of Nebraska–Lincoln ag educator Matt Kreifels discusses his recent FFA Alumni award and the future of ag education.
Mexico plans to release 202,000 acre-feet of water into the Rio Grande, offering temporary relief to South Texas farmers as Congress advances the PERMIT Act.
Analysts say that while low-income households are facing financial pressures, other middle- and higher-income consumers are helping fill the gap for retail beef demand.
Despite China’s sharp drop in grain purchases this year, new USDA export data this week shows that even some buying activity from the trade giant still moves the markets.