Rebuilding U.S. Textiles Requires New Industrial Model to Compete with Synthetics

Rebuilding domestic textiles depends on automation and vertical integration, not tariffs or legacy manufacturing models.

LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD NEWS) — Efforts to bring textile and apparel manufacturing back to the United States will fail if they rely on outdated models, according to textile executive Bob Antoshak, who argues the industry’s return depends on building something fundamentally different from what existed decades ago. Rising labor costs and global competition have permanently closed the door on labor-intensive mills, but they have not eliminated the opportunity for a modern, automated domestic industry.

Antoshak points to early investments in nearshoring and advanced manufacturing as evidence that the sector can re-emerge if it is highly automated, vertically integrated, and closely connected to consumer demand. These projects prioritize speed, flexibility, and control over low wages, enabling producers to respond more quickly to market shifts and supply disruptions.

He cautions that tariffs alone do not create an industrial strategy. Broad import duties raise costs across the supply chain, including machinery and equipment needed for automation, ultimately increasing expenses for domestic producers and consumers without meaningfully rebuilding capacity.

The viable path forward centers on full vertical integration — from fiber or yarn through finished goods — supported by significant capital investment, advanced robotics, digital planning, and real-time market feedback. This approach reduces dependence on fragmented global sourcing and strengthens supply chain resilience.

Antoshak argues the next U.S. textile sector will be smaller in workforce but higher in output, technologically driven, and built around transparent, distinctly American brand narratives rather than nostalgia.

Related Stories
The uncommon delivery has kept one farmer busy caring for four newborn kids at once.
Aimee Bissell discusses Iowa planting progress, weather conditions, fertilizer costs, and concerns over early crop development.
The inverted Choice-Select spread is not a strong warning sign in today’s tighter, higher-quality beef market, according to new analysis from Terrain.
Based on USDA data compiled by the U.S. Meat Export Federation, pork exports increased by six percent in March compared to the previous year, while beef exports weakened overall.
Autumn Lankford Higgins with the Farm Bureau joins us to discuss data center expansion on farmland, rural policy considerations, and the role of agriculture in emerging digital infrastructure.
RealAg Radio’s Shaun Haney joins us to discuss geopolitical trade tensions, energy market volatility, and what global shifts could mean for U.S. agriculture exports.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Expect a steady corn grind and selective basis strength where exports and local blending stay active.
ock NH3 early, track China’s Oct. 15 call and any U.S. Russia-UAN action, stay nimble on urea, and budget cautiously for high-priced phosphate.
Expect business-as-usual for most container exports.
Cade Fiske’s approach embodies the spirit of the FFA — blending education, leadership, and innovation to inspire the future of agriculture.
The Washington Tree Fruit Association says this is not surprising and notes the USDA has offered a lifeline to growers while they transition away from the cannery market.