Republican lawmakers push back on EV mandate: “It sounds like they’re forcing the farmers out of the market”

Senator Joni Ernst is one of many Republican lawmakers fighting the Biden Administration’s Electric Vehicle mandate and advocating for consumer choice in the agricultural industry.

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) voiced her concerns about the current Administration’s push for electric vehicles (EVs) in a fiery statement this week on Capitol Hill. She warned that the mandates coming from the White House could have adverse effects on farmers and certain markets.

While there is widespread support for reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainability, Sen. Ernst believes that this approach could inadvertently hurt the livelihoods of many hardworking farmers.

“I agree that we can move to sustainable aviation fuel, but I’m telling you, when you have a mandate coming from the federal government, this administration—that half of the new vehicles being sold will be EVs—it sounds like they’re forcing the farmers out of the market,” Sen. Ernst said.

The senator’s remarks come in the wake of the Biden Administration’s aggressive push toward a greener future for the transportation industry.

To address her concerns, Sen. Ernst is sponsoring a new piece of legislation introduced this session called the “Preserving Choice in Vehicle Purchases Act.”. The Republican-backed bill aims to protect the rights of consumers, including farmers, to choose the vehicles that best suit their needs without government-imposed mandates.

The bill, co-sponsored by Rep. John Joyce (R-PA), saw significant progress in the House of Representatives, with lawmakers passing it with a majority vote on Sept. 14. Now, all eyes turn to the Senate as the bill makes its way through the legislative process.

The Biden Administration also released a statement
strongly opposing the bill, saying in part:

“The Administration strongly opposes passage of H.R. 1435, which would amend the Clean Air Act (CAA) to preclude EPA from issuing federal preemption waivers for California pollution standards that directly or indirectly limit the sale or use of new motor vehicles with internal combustion engines. If enacted, the EPA Administrator would also be required to revoke any waiver that does not comply with this requirement granted under section 209(b) from January 2022 to the date of enactment of the bill.”

The Administration’s statement went on to say that the bill would directly affect the State of California’s ability to regulate vehicle emissions and “address its severe air pollution challenges.”

Related Stories
RFD-TV Farm Legal and Tax Expert Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law dives into a “potpourri” of ag tax and law-related issues in his latest Firm to Farm blog post.
The long-term viability of a ranching operation often hinges on how effectively its owners navigate the overlapping layers of IRS regulations, state tax incentives, and USDA disaster programs.
“The regulations... set up a very complicated set of rules for both horse owners and event managers.”

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Global pork production is expected to rise in the first half of 2026, despite trade volatility stemming from shifting import policies and swine disease pressures.
Clear right-to-repair guidance reduces downtime, repair costs, and operational risk.
Tennessee State Veterinarian Dr. Samantha Batey joined us with the latest on biosecurity efforts and the state’s new “Know Before You Show” initiative.
Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller discusses the state’s latest efforts to prevent the New World screwworm from reaching Texas.
Economists are also closely watching how policy decisions in Washington could influence markets moving forward. Analysts say deferred futures for corn, soybeans, and wheat suggest markets are operating near break-even levels, not at prices that would encourage expanded production.
House Agriculture Committee Chairman “GT” Thompson is pushing a “Farm Bill 2.0.”