Rural Money: New Payment Rules Leave Farmers Facing Confusion at Local FSA Offices

New farm payment rules allow LLC members to have separate limits, but some local FSA offices are still applying outdated policies, creating confusion for producers.

Shelly_Muzzall_01_21_19_USA_WA_Three_Sisters_Farm_018.jpg

3 Sisters Family Farm (FarmHER S4, Ep. 9)

FarmHer, Inc.

TOPEKA, Kan. (RFD NEWS) — A major policy change affecting farm program payments is causing confusion at the local level, as some producers report being held to outdated rules despite new federal guidance.

Under the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act (OBBBA), Congress revised how payment limits apply to pass-through entities, such as LLCs and S corporations. The update allows individual members of those entities to qualify for separate payment limits, rather than being capped at a single limit per entity.

The change was intended to eliminate what industry experts have long called the “person trap,” which previously pushed some operations into more complex business structures to maximize eligibility.

However, implementation has been uneven.

According to agricultural tax and law specialist Roger McEowen and his colleague Paul Neiffer, many local Farm Service Agency offices are still applying the previous “one-entity, one-limit” standard.

That disconnect appears to stem from a lag in training and guidance at the county level. Local offices are now required to verify that each individual within an LLC or S corporation meets the “Actively Engaged in Farming” standard — meaning they must provide proportional labor, management, or capital.

That added verification has created administrative challenges, with some offices defaulting to older interpretations until further direction is provided by state or national leadership.

Producers who are told the rule has not changed may need to take additional steps. Experts recommend consulting the updated FSA Handbook and requesting that local determinations be reviewed or escalated to the state office.

Clear documentation is also critical. Farmers seeking separate payment limits should be prepared to show detailed records of each member’s contributions to the operation.

While the policy shift is widely viewed as a positive for many farm businesses, the rollout highlights a familiar challenge in agriculture policy — changes in Washington do not always translate immediately on the ground.

READ MORE: FSA Entity Confusion — Firm to Farm

Related Stories
The USDA opened a new sterile fly-dispersal facility at Moore Air Base in South Texas to prevent a potential outbreak of New World screwworm and protect the small U.S. cattle herd.
China’s reliance on imported soybeans remains entrenched, shaping global demand and trade leverage.
Cuba remains a steady, nearby buyer of U.S. poultry, pork, dairy, and staples, but legal and compliance risks could still affect shipping and payment channels.
Agriculture remains a key drag on regional growth amid weak prices and policy uncertainty.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Farmers await concrete trade commitments from China. Until then, export prospects for soybeans, corn, and sorghum remain uncertain against strong South American competition.
Understanding the Big, Beautiful Bill’s complex impact on SNAP benefits – that’s the topic of today’s Firm to Farm blog post by RFD-TV’s legal expert, Roger McEowen.
Missouri Cattle RanchHER Alda Owen joined us on Monday’s Market Day Report to talk about the all-new episode of FarmHER + RanchHER, which premieres on Thursday, Sept. 19!
U.S. trade talks with China resume, but meat industry leaders say dealing with shifting demand and market uncertainty is nothing new in this side of the ag sector.
Tariffs are pushing up input costs, with fertilizer prices rising $100 per ton and machinery costs climbing due to steel and parts duties.
Year-round sales of E-15 are another major topic on Capitol Hill, which, according to Rep. Adrian Smith (R-NE), is one issue up for debate this session with significant bipartisan support.