Study: Crop Insurance Greatly Reduces Revenue Risk

Crop insurance remains a vital tool for managing climate-driven risk.

agricultural land affected by flooding crop insurance_Photo By Andrii Yalanskyi via Adobe Stock.jpg

Photo By Andrii Yalanskyi via Adobe Stock

LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD-TV)New research from North Dakota State University highlights the role of crop insurance in shielding farmers from revenue losses between 2015 and 2023.

Led by Senior Research Economist Francis Tsiboe, the study found that combining basic insurance products, such as Revenue Protection (RP) and Yield Protection (YP), with supplemental policies, including the Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO) and Enhanced Coverage Option (ECO), significantly boosted revenue stability.

Farmers using these combined programs had a 27.9 percent higher chance of recovering losses compared to those farming without insurance. Revenue variability dropped by nearly half, while downside risk fell by more than 80 percent.

Cotton saw the highest reduction in downside revenue risk at 88 percent, followed by corn, canola, and wheat. Geographically, states like Arizona, Iowa, and Illinois reported the strongest protections, while regions such as Arkansas and California saw more modest benefits.

The study also noted that the strongest protections often came with higher producer costs, though recent legislation in the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) increased premium subsidies for SCO and ECO to 80 percent, easing the out-of-pocket burden for farmers.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Crop insurance remains a vital tool for managing climate-driven risk. Supplemental policies can significantly reduce revenue volatility, with expanded subsidies making them more accessible and affordable for producers nationwide.

Related Stories
RFD-TV tax expert Roger McEowen discusses the renewed tax provision and how cattle producers can take advantage of it to recover investments in heifer retention and herd expansion more quickly.
A high-stakes legal case in a South Dakota federal court concerning misleading country-of-origin labeling (MCOOL), such as “Product of the USA,” on food products, will significantly impact U.S. agricultural policy for years to come.
Tight fed supplies shift margin risk to packers, strengthening cattle price leverage but increasing volatility.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

In a post to social media, Trump said Venezuela will buy American agriculture products and will use the money from oil sales to make it happen.
Federal nutrition policy is signaling a stronger demand for whole foods produced by U.S. farmers and ranchers. Consumer-facing guidance favors animal protein, but institutional demand may change little under existing saturated fat limits.
Farmer Bridge payments are being used primarily to reduce debt and protect cash flow, not drive new spending. Curt Blades with the Association of Equipment Manufacturers joined us to provide insight into the ag equipment market and the factors influencing sales.
Rail strength is helping stabilize grain movement, but river and export slowdowns continue to limit overall logistics momentum.
Retail pricing confirms tight cattle supplies and supports continued leverage for producers, reinforcing the need for disciplined risk management.
Wed, 1/21/26 – 7:30 PM ET | 6:30 PM CT | 5:30 PM MT | 4:30 PM PT