Trump’s Argentine Beef Import Plan Sparks Rancher Backlash

Cattle groups say additional imports would offer little relief for consumers but could erode rancher confidence as the industry begins to rebuild herds.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD-TV) — President Donald Trump’s suggestion that the United States may import more beef from Argentina to reduce record retail prices has triggered backlash from across the cattle industry.

Producer groups argue that new imports would do little to ease costs for consumers while creating added market instability at a time when domestic supplies are already stretched thin. Economists estimate Argentina accounts for roughly 2 percent of total U.S. beef imports — far too little, they say, to materially affect prices.

Industry organizations, including the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA), American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF), and National Farmers Union (NFU), warned that policy signals alone can move futures markets and discourage herd rebuilding.

U.S. cattle numbers remain at their lowest in nearly 75 years after years of drought and high feed costs, and recent restrictions on live imports from Mexico have further tightened supply. Futures markets dropped sharply following the president’s comments before stabilizing early in the week.

Farm groups urged the administration to strengthen transparency, enforce fair competition among packers, and rebuild domestic capacity rather than rely on foreign beef. “Flooding markets with imported product weakens our foundation and undermines rural America,” the U.S. Cattlemen’s Association said, emphasizing that retail prices reflect the true, inflation-adjusted cost of raising cattle in the current environment.

The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association says they have numerous concerns with the plan, warning that it would create chaos at a critical time for America’s cattle producers and do nothing to lower grocery store beef prices.

Foot and mouth disease is also a concern with beef imports from Argentina. According to NCBA President Colin Woodall, Argentina has a history of the disease, and warns it would decimate the U.S. livestock sector if brought here – a small herd already facing pressure from the outbreak of the New World Screwworm just south of the border.

Allendale Chief Economist Rich Nelson told RFD-TV that U.S. imports from Argentina likely will not solve anything with the U.S. herd, and rancher groups are opposing any potential imports of Argentinian beef.

“A lot of people suggested that it might be some type of import deal, perhaps from Argentina,” Nelson said. “Now, before that discussion point, though, the trade had been pricing in the belief that we had our recent break in cash cattle, and it’ll be done. And certainly, with last week’s higher trades and certainly with now futures re-guessing their questions, we have to point out that Argentina is #5 for a beef exporter, but they’re only 6% of the world market. So realistically, can we actually get all the supplies to stop next year’s decline in production? The answer is probably no here.”

Related Stories
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) estimates that the move will save farmers and ranchers $2.5 billion each year. The group warns that new methods for calculating the adverse-effect wage rate would result in lower pay for foreign workers.
Higher rail tariffs and tighter Canadian supplies will keep oat transportation costs firm into 2026.
These “USDA Foods” are provided to USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) nutrition assistance programs, including food banks that operate The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), and are a vital component of the nation’s food safety net.
Lower U.S. and Mexican production means tighter sugar supplies and greater reliance on imports headed into 2026.
Tyson’s closure reflects deep supply shortages in the U.S. cattle industry, tightening packing capacity, weakening competition, and signaling more volatility ahead for cow-calf producers and feedyards.
Gary Hall, co-founder of Hollywood Impact Studios Rehabilitation, joined the program to discuss using agriculture to provide opportunities and mentorship for at-risk youth in Southern California.
Screwworm.gov has targeted resources for a wide range of stakeholders, including livestock producers, veterinarians, animal health officials, wildlife professionals, healthcare providers, pet owners, researchers, drug manufacturers, and the general public.
Sen. Roger Marshall discusses the Senate’s unanimous passage of the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act and what expanded milk options could mean for students and dairy farmers. Industry groups say it is a win for student nutrition and dairy producers.
Crop producers face tightening credit and lower incomes, while strong cattle markets continue to stabilize finances in livestock-heavy regions.