Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern Refile $85B Rail Merger Application

Higher freight rates and potential service disruptions are key concerns for agriculture, which relies heavily on rail to move commodities.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD NEWS) — An $85 billion rail merger is back in front of federal regulators, as Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern refile their application to create the first coast-to-coast freight rail network in the United States.

The companies say the proposed deal could deliver major efficiencies across the supply chain, estimating savings of $3.5 billion annually for shippers. They also project the merger could remove more than two million trucks from U.S. roads and create roughly 1,200 union jobs.

However, opposition is mounting. Farm groups, shippers, and some state leaders warn the consolidation could reduce competition, leading to higher freight rates and potential service disruptions—key concerns for agriculture, which relies heavily on rail to move commodities.

The renewed filing follows an earlier setback from the Surface Transportation Board, which rejected the initial application due to insufficient detail.

Mike Steenhoek with the Soy Transportation Coalition explained the situation:

“What happened is that Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern had to submit a formal application to what’s called the U.S. Surface Transportation Board. That’s the government agency that has jurisdiction over approving or rejecting any kind of railroad merger or acquisition. And what the Surface Transportation Board determined was that the application was incomplete, and so they rejected the application. They really needed much more information than was provided within the application. They really need to understand, in order to make a proper ruling on this, they have to understand what’s going to be the impact on the public interest. What’s going to be the non-competition market power if this merger is allowed to move forward.”

The Surface Transportation Board is now reviewing the revised proposal, with public comments due by May 8.

RFD News will continue to follow developments as regulators weigh the potential impact on agriculture and the broader transportation system.

Related Stories
More flexible export financing could strengthen demand in emerging markets and support higher U.S. agricultural exports.
Incremental trade clarity with India could support select U.S. ag exports, but major gains hinge on future market-access talks.
The House Agriculture Committee is set to debate a new, “skinny” Farm Bill at the end of February, according to a release from Committee Chairman Rep. Glenn “GT” Thompson.
The phone call injected optimism into the soybean market, but actual Chinese buying and its timing will ultimately determine the extent of U.S. agricultural export benefits.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Lawmakers are pressing for answers on how Washington’s “managed trade” approach — keeping leverage through long-term tariffs — will affect farmers, global markets, and future export opportunities.
In the meantime, Senate Majority Leader John Thune is asking that farmers be allowed to use marketing assistance loans to help stay afloat.
Beef industry groups seem to agree — market-based pricing, not federal intervention, best supports rancher livelihoods and long-term beef supply stability.
Cattle groups say additional imports would offer little relief for consumers but could erode rancher confidence as the industry begins to rebuild herds.
Harvest Pace, Logistics, and Input Costs Drive Fall Decisions