USDA Links Rural Investment With Stronger County Growth

The report highlighted the role rural development programs play in supporting housing, infrastructure and essential services.

clifton-tn-antique-district_By-Austin-via-Adobe-Stock.png

The antique district in Clifton, Tennessee, was accredited by the Tennessee Main Street program in 2021 after their participation in the project. (Photo by Austin via Adobe Stock)

Photo by Austin via Adobe Stock

WASHINGTON, DC (RFD NEWS) — USDA reported last week that rural development investment is used most heavily in farming-dependent counties, connecting farm communities with housing, utilities, business financing, and essential services. The Economic Research Service reviewed Rural Development program obligations from 2000 through 2024.

Farm-dependent nonmetropolitan counties recorded the highest participation, with per-person investment rising from $3,741 in 2000-2011 to $4,693 in 2012-2024. The Southeast received the largest overall share of obligations, while the Rocky Mountain region led on a rural per-person basis.

Counties receiving the highest per-person investment averaged 39.9 percent real income growth over the study period, compared with 31.8 percent in the lowest-investment group. USDA cautions that the comparison shows an association, not proof that the funding alone caused higher growth.

Single-family housing accounted for 55 percent of obligations, and higher participation was associated with higher homeownership. Most support came through loans: 57 percent through guarantees and 33 percent through direct loans, while grants accounted for 10 percent.

For producers, rural housing, water, power, broadband, health care, and business capacity influence whether workers and families can remain in agricultural communities.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Rural development investment supports the housing, services, and infrastructure farm communities need to retain workers and remain viable.
Tony St. James, RFD News Markets Specialist
Related Stories
USDA’s February WASDE report, analysts expect minimal price movement as grain stocks remain steady. Traders weigh renewed Chinese soybean purchases, South American weather, acreage shifts, and upcoming USMCA trade talks.
Income support helps, but farm finances remain tight heading into 2026.
Strong supplies and rising stocks point to continued price pressure unless demand accelerates.
The USDA’s February WASDE report looms as the CME Ag Economy Barometer shows declining farmer confidence, and more ag industry groups calling for swift policy action.
Danny Munch of the American Farm Bureau joined us to discuss USDA’s latest farm income forecast, revisions to prior estimates, and what the updated data means for farmers heading into 2026.
Representative Henry Cuellar (D-TX), who sits on the U.S. House Appropriations Committee, spoke exclusively with RFD NEWS about what Congress is doing to address screwworm concerns, including funding for a sterile fly production facility in Mexico.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

USDA Cattle-on-Feed report for March shows slightly lower inventory and higher February placements, signaling a tighter supply but steady outlook for the U.S. cattle herd.
Energy risks could reshape global ag trade flows.
The ag trade deficit is narrowing, but export competition remains strong.
E15 policy could shape future corn demand outlook.
Agricultural groups warn that the deal could limit competition and raise transportation costs for farmers
The Trump Administration’s new rule limiting CDL renewals for immigrant truckers is seeing mixed reactions in agriculture. While some support the change, it is raising concerns about higher freight costs and impacts on U.S. grain export competitiveness.